LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 86
0 members and 86 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 01-23-2004, 06:42 PM   #11
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Moderator
 
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pop goes the chupacabra
Posts: 18,532
Yeah, the GOP is all about states' rights in overturning RvW.

Quote:
Originally posted by Not Me
Well if that is your reasoning, then what about the case where the father wants the mom to have an abortion or to give the baby up for adoption and she won't and a court orders him to pay child support? He didn't want the kid. He voted for abortion or adoption. Why should he have to work to pay child support for a kid he didn't want? Isn't that temporary involuntary servitude imposed on the father?
Yes, and I think I may even have expressed my opinion on this somewhere on these boards. But I'm too lazy, not just intellectually lazy, to look it up.
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:54 PM.