LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 2,847
0 members and 2,847 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 02-23-2004, 03:14 PM   #11
Not Me
Too Lazy to Google
 
Not Me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,460
just a thought

Quote:
Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
You can defend segregation on the basis of S. Ct. cases from that era as well.
You have misunderstood me. I neither agree not disagree with their reasoning. I was simply addressing Ty's claim that there is no purported reason. There is a purported reason. I never addressed whether it is a good reason or not.

I am the one against the mindless breeding that goes on in this society, remember? I am highly unlikely to find the Supreme Court's reasoning on this issue valid. But that wasn't the issue. The issue was is there a purported reason behind government sanctioned marriage. There is a purported reason, the operative word being purported.
__________________
IRL I'm Charming.
Not Me is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:57 AM.