LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 3,145
0 members and 3,145 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 03-03-2004, 03:37 PM   #11
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,150
Oh. My. God.

Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone_Slothrop
If this is true, this is really, really awful. NBC News is reporting that the military had plans to take out one of the leading terrorist threats, Abu Musab Zarqawi, whom David Brooks described as "one of the world's most brutal mass murderers," but that the political leadership at the White House stopped the operation because they worried that it would undercut the case for invading Iraq:
  • In June 2002, U.S. officials say intelligence had revealed that Zarqawi and members of al-Qaida had set up a weapons lab at Kirma, in northern Iraq, producing deadly ricin and cyanide.
    The Pentagon quickly drafted plans to attack the camp with cruise missiles and airstrikes and sent it to the White House, where, according to U.S. government sources, the plan was debated to death in the National Security Council.

    . . .

    The Pentagon drew up a second strike plan, and the White House again killed it. By then the administration had set its course for war with Iraq.

    . . .

    Military officials insist their case for attacking Zarqawi’s operation was airtight, but the administration feared destroying the terrorist camp in Iraq could undercut its case for war against Saddam.

more

eta: I can't find the NBC News story that Yglesias appears to be quoting from, but he's not the sort to make this stuff up
Numbskull. In June 2002 we were still listening to you guys and trying to get UN approval to make Iraq fix things the UN insisted it fix 10 years earlier. While we were trying to get the UN to give us permission, you think it made sense to go into Iraq and blow stuff up? I know these guys were seperate from Saddam, but still the unauthorized attack.
What the source for the "why," couldn't the "why" have been we aren't going to turn cowboy if we don't have to. And this guy is "one of the world's most brutal mass murderers."
Can you think of one other Ty?
I bet you are a fucking a pain in litigation. "Hank, I noticed pps 12,356-59 have some marks. I'm concerned you masked information and I'm filing a motion tomorrow to have you BLAH BLAH>"
Hank Chinaski is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:10 AM.