LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   Politics (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   My God, you are an idiot. (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=861)

Cletus Miller 06-14-2011 11:08 AM

Re: My God, you are an idiot.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Adder (Post 454089)
We did it before and it didn't bring huge growth. That isn't meaningless.

But yeah, it's only a correlation. It could be that other factors undermined growth when we did it before, or that other factors will make it grow this time. But that doesn't make it not evidence (hi, Hank!).

But maybe without the cuts, there would have been 10% annual *contraction* from 2001-2008. Then the net "growth" resulting from the cuts would be phenomenal.

There is nothing that dictates that the true baseline size of the economy is the prior year.

sgtclub 06-14-2011 11:12 AM

Re: Newsflash
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 454085)
Magic Underwear problem. In all sincerity, I could not vote for a Mormon. All religion is a bit far fetched, of course, and yes, I understand that many do not actually believe in their church's loony teachings, but instead use it as an "inside handshake" thing for business purposes (I've been told as much by Mormon friends). Still, anyone even professing to buy into a faith so comical on its face, and so unequivocally proven to have been a fraud, perpetrated by a historically acknowledged con man,* shows a capacity for suspension of disbelief and lack of judgment so deep as to disqualify him from office.

And I think most of the country agrees with me. Justifiably, and for good reason.

*Also an unabashed racist and misogynist.

Why is Mormonism any more ridiculous than any other religion?

Adder 06-14-2011 11:17 AM

Re: My God, you are an idiot.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cletus Miller (Post 454090)
But maybe without the cuts, there would have been 10% annual *contraction* from 2001-2008. Then the net "growth" resulting from the cuts would be phenomenal.

There is nothing that dictates that the true baseline size of the economy is the prior year.

Yes, one needs to assume something about the base case. You can choose to assume something extreme if you want. That's silly, of course, and if you're really curious you can go find what the people who model these thing if you want.

Adder 06-14-2011 11:18 AM

Re: Newsflash
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sgtclub (Post 454092)
Why is Mormonism any more ridiculous than any other religion?

I tend to favor the candidate who seems least likely to believe in his professed religion and agree that I don't see Mormonism any differently.

Adder 06-14-2011 11:24 AM

Morning Headline
 
In this instance, Norquist, Klobuchar, bad. Coburn good.

Cletus Miller 06-14-2011 11:28 AM

Re: My God, you are an idiot.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Adder (Post 454093)
Yes, one needs to assume something about the base case. You can choose to assume something extreme if you want. That's silly, of course, and if you're really curious you can go find what the people who model these thing if you want.

But that's part of the point. The choice of prior-year-actual as a baseline is itself argumentative in this circumstance, especially when comparing 2001-2010 growth to all post-war growth, without any (non-inflation-related) adjustment.

Cletus Miller 06-14-2011 11:35 AM

Re: Morning Headline
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Adder (Post 454095)

In what instance is Norquist "good"? At least in your view.

sebastian_dangerfield 06-14-2011 11:43 AM

Re: Newsflash
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sgtclub (Post 454092)
Why is Mormonism any more ridiculous than any other religion?

Let's go with a comparison to the Big Three.

1. Judaism is probably the most sensible and credible religion becuase it is basically common sense rules for living embroidered with divine myths. Why the embroidery? Because you needed myths to create authority to compel the population to follow the rules. But if you consider any Talmudic debates, you'll see logic more than religion.

2. Christianity co-opted the rules of Judaism, and added the somewhat unrealistic, but nevertheless laudable teachings of Jesus. Sadly, it also centralized into a Church, which is basically a gaudy, silly bureacratic mess, obsessed with bizarre and inane rituals.

3. Islam is the Godfather III of the bunch. It's a contradictory mess of pieces of the first two bastardized into a political/legal framework by an oppressed and deeply resentful culture. It's the sequel no one needed that has, unfortunately, persisted like the Rocky Horror Picture Show.

I don't address Buddhism and Hinduism because they are more personal than community-based.

But what do the Big Three share? They all took hold a long time ago, and the alleged historical facts underpinning them can never be completely validated or debunked. They've also stood the test of time, which many followers can misapprehend as proof they are earnest, or at least more than cynical frauds started by proven con men.

Mormonism, on the other hand, is recent, and can be proven beyond any contrary argument to have been created by a charlatan, a criminal of notorious and embarrassing history. The record of Smith's probable mental illness and sociopathic nature is not in question. And the divine story he wove is so bizarre, and so contrary to the historical record, one cannot accept the Book of Mormon as much more than science fiction. That Joseph Smith is recorded as having created this stuff from behind a sheet, allegedly reading stones immersed in water, in a cabin in upstate New York (a hotbed of religious cults in his day), only renders the myth more ludicrous.

Those belonging to old faiths at least have the excuse that they can never know how much of what they believe in their gospels or verses actually took place. Mormons who are honest with themselves know they're worshipping the ravings of at best a lunatic, at worst a craven degenerate who hated women and blacks and sought nothing more than to fuck as many of a "flock" of deluded female followers as he could. It's nonsense, and I would hope as a country we would question the fitness of any candidate professing to believe something so objectively absurd.

Hank Chinaski 06-14-2011 11:50 AM

Re: Newsflash
 
Quote:



Mormons who are honest with themselves know they're worshipping the ravings of at best a lunatic, at worst a craven degenerate who hated women and blacks and sought nothing more than to fuck as many of a "flock" of pathetic deluded female followers as he could. It's nonsense, and I would hope as a country we would questions the fitness of any candidate professing to believe something so objectively absurd.
if I could start over I'd be Mormon on the off chance I could nail a chick from BYU's dance team.

Adder 06-14-2011 11:59 AM

Re: Morning Headline
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cletus Miller (Post 454098)
In what instance is Norquist "good"? At least in your view.

Good point. The other's tend to flop around in my estimation.

sgtclub 06-14-2011 12:22 PM

Re: Newsflash
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 454100)
Let's go with a comparison to the Big Three.

1. Judaism is probably the most sensible and credible religion becuase it is basically common sense rules for living embroidered with divine myths. Why the embroidery? Because you needed myths to create authority to compel the population to follow the rules. But if you consider any Talmudic debates, you'll see logic more than religion.

2. Christianity co-opted the rules of Judaism, and added the somewhat unrealistic, but nevertheless laudable teachings of Jesus. Sadly, it also centralized into a Church, which is basically a gaudy, silly bureacratic mess, obsessed with bizarre and inane rituals.

3. Islam is the Godfather III of the bunch. It's a contradictory mess of pieces of the first two bastardized into a political/legal framework by an oppressed and deeply resentful culture. It's the sequel no one needed that has, unfortunately, persisted like the Rocky Horror Picture Show.

I don't address Buddhism and Hinduism because they are more personal than community-based.

But what do the Big Three share? They all took hold a long time ago, and the alleged historical facts underpinning them can never be completely validated or debunked. They've also stood the test of time, which many followers can misapprehend as proof they are earnest, or at least more than cynical frauds started by proven con men.

Mormonism, on the other hand, is recent, and can be proven beyond any contrary argument to have been created by a charlatan, a criminal of notorious and embarrassing history. The record of Smith's probable mental illness and sociopathic nature is not in question. And the divine story he wove is so bizarre, and so contrary to the historical record, one cannot accept the Book of Mormon as much more than science fiction. That Joseph Smith is recorded as having created this stuff from behind a sheet, allegedly reading stones immersed in water, in a cabin in upstate New York (a hotbed of religious cults in his day), only renders the myth more ludicrous.

Those belonging to old faiths at least have the excuse that they can never know how much of what they believe in their gospels or verses actually took place. Mormons who are honest with themselves know they're worshipping the ravings of at best a lunatic, at worst a craven degenerate who hated women and blacks and sought nothing more than to fuck as many of a "flock" of deluded female followers as he could. It's nonsense, and I would hope as a country we would question the fitness of any candidate professing to believe something so objectively absurd.

Sorry, I just don't see it. Your argument seems to be that Mormonism is worse because it is newer and we can prove for certain that it's based on bunk. In my mind, the only difference between the big 3 and Mormonism is that the big 3 are older. They are all based on bunk. Period. End. Of. Story.

This is not to say that many of the teachings of these religions are not worthy and historically important (or perhaps critical) in human evolution. But they are all based on fantasy and to rule out a candidate solely based on one of these religions as opposed to another blows my mind.

Cletus Miller 06-14-2011 12:37 PM

Re: Newsflash
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sgtclub (Post 454103)
Sorry, I just don't see it. Your argument seems to be that Mormonism is worse because it is newer and we can prove for certain that it's based on bunk. In my mind, the only difference between the big 3 and Mormonism is that the big 3 are older. They are all based on bunk. Period. End. Of. Story.

This is not to say that many of the teachings of these religions are not worthy and historically important (or perhaps critical) in human evolution. But they are all based on fantasy and to rule out a candidate solely based on one of these religions as opposed to another blows my mind.

You are aware that there is no way to know whether any muslim is a terrorist and/or wants to impose Sharia law on the USA, right?

sgtclub 06-14-2011 04:59 PM

Re: Newsflash
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cletus Miller (Post 454104)
You are aware that there is no way to know whether any muslim is a terrorist and/or wants to impose Sharia law on the USA, right?

Huh?

Cletus Miller 06-14-2011 05:14 PM

Re: Newsflash
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sgtclub (Post 454108)
Huh?

Herm Cain:

"You have peaceful Muslims and you have militant Muslims – those that are trying to kill us. And so when I said I wouldn't be comfortable [appointing a Muslin to his cabinet or as a judge] I was thinking about the ones that are trying to kill us"

...

"I do not believe in Sharia law in American courts. I believe in American laws in American courts, period."

Fucking Magnets, How Do They Work?

Gattigap 06-14-2011 05:19 PM

Re: My God, you are an idiot.
 
Sebby,

If you didn't happen to have followed Weed's advice and watched the Tonys, go find a YouTube clip of the kid singing "I Believe" from the Parker and Stone show, The Book of Mormon. You'll love it.

futbol fan 06-14-2011 05:34 PM

Re: My God, you are an idiot.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gattigap (Post 454111)
Sebby,

If you didn't happen to have followed Weed's advice and watched the Tonys, go find a YouTube clip of the kid singing "I Believe" from the Parker and Stone show, The Book of Mormon. You'll love it.

That bit was excellent, and if the whole thing is like that (which is what I have heard, or better) it is seriously shaping up as an exception to my See No Musicals Ever rule, which has been carved in stone since I was dragged to Wicked many years ago by the woman who is lucky to still be my wife after subjecting me to that bullshit.

sgtclub 06-14-2011 05:45 PM

Re: Newsflash
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cletus Miller (Post 454110)
Herm Cain:

"You have peaceful Muslims and you have militant Muslims – those that are trying to kill us. And so when I said I wouldn't be comfortable [appointing a Muslin to his cabinet or as a judge] I was thinking about the ones that are trying to kill us"

...

"I do not believe in Sharia law in American courts. I believe in American laws in American courts, period."

Fucking Magnets, How Do They Work?

Yea, I actually saw that live. I was amazed, but didn't think much of it as I didn't think anyone was taking Cain seriously.

Hank Chinaski 06-14-2011 06:03 PM

Re: My God, you are an idiot.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ironweed (Post 454112)
That bit was excellent, and if the whole thing is like that (which is what I have heard, or better) it is seriously shaping up as an exception to my See No Musicals Ever rule, which has been carved in stone since I was dragged to Wicked many years ago by the woman who is lucky to still be my wife after subjecting me to that bullshit.

Took my wife to this. It was good.

Hank Chinaski 06-14-2011 06:05 PM

Re: Newsflash
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cletus Miller (Post 454104)
You are aware that there is no way to know whether any muslim is a terrorist and/or wants to impose Sharia law on the USA, right?

it seems like anyone named "abu" is al queda

Cletus Miller 06-14-2011 06:18 PM

Re: Newsflash
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 454117)
it seems like anyone named "abu" is al queda

Makes using Abu Ghraib look pretty foolish, in retrospect.

Adder 06-14-2011 06:25 PM

Re: Newsflash
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 454117)
it seems like anyone named "abu" is al queda

As Cletus took the easy joke, I'll go with the pathetic sincere response (I haven't got any other moves).

"Abu" means "father of" and is a common alternate name in the Arab world for a man who has had a son. Thus we could call you abu [your son's name] or Hank Chinaski alternatively.

Hank Chinaski 06-14-2011 06:26 PM

Re: My God, you are an idiot.
 
sanity prevails

Hank Chinaski 06-14-2011 06:28 PM

Re: Newsflash
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Adder (Post 454121)
As Cletus took the easy joke, I'll take go with the pathetic sincere response (I haven't got any other moves).

"Abu" means "father of" and is a common alternate name in the Arab world for a man who has had a son. Thus we could call you abu [your son's name] or Hank Chinaski alternatively.

so. most non-aq muslims have names w/o abu, like mohammad ali, or barrack obama, but whenever we kill one of these guys it's always abu something or other.

LessinSF 06-14-2011 06:33 PM

Re: My God, you are an idiot.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ironweed (Post 454112)
That bit was excellent, and if the whole thing is like that (which is what I have heard, or better) it is seriously shaping up as an exception to my See No Musicals Ever rule, which has been carved in stone since I was dragged to Wicked many years ago by the woman who is lucky to still be my wife after subjecting me to that bullshit.

I saw American Idiot, but I'm not sure that counts.

Hank Chinaski 06-14-2011 06:37 PM

Re: My God, you are an idiot.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by LessinSF (Post 454126)
I saw American Idiot, but I'm not sure that counts.

I'm counting it, against you. no offense.

Adder 06-14-2011 09:27 PM

Re: Newsflash
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 454124)
so. most non-aq muslims have names w/o abu, like mohammad ali, or barrack obama, but whenever we kill one of these guys it's always abu something or other.

Yeah. That's because of a choice someone made about what name to write down.

Gattigap 06-15-2011 10:49 AM

Re: My God, you are an idiot.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sgtclub (Post 454078)
just watched the last half hour of the debates. The GOP field is actually not as totally dismal as I previously thought.

Apparently all the fun stuff happened prior to the last 30 minutes. For example:

Quote:

53 to 54 minutes. We’re back. There is breaking news. “We’ve become, we are told, a trending topic on Twitter,” announces King, before forcing a mystified Paul to choose between a BlackBerry and an iPhone. Paul chooses a BlackBerry. But his face is the face of a man who has delivered 4,000 babies and still not seen it all.

55 to 65 minutes. Questions about Medicare, Social Security and the debt limit. Gingrich doubles down on his criticism of the Paul Ryan budget plan, which led to the collapse of his campaign operation. “If you can’t convince the American people it’s a good idea, maybe it’s not a good idea,” he says. Oof. Somewhere, his former staff are buying themselves another round.

66 to 72 minutes. Questions about church and state, with standard answers. Cain spends a couple of minutes struggling to describe how he would handle hiring Muslims in his Administration, by treating them fairly but with more suspicion. Gingrich agrees that Muslims deserve higher scrutiny, like communists or Nazis. “We have got to have the guts to stand up and say no,” he says. Another round for his former staff.

73 minutes. King asks Cain: Deep dish or thin crust? “Deep dish,” says Cain. This permits another cut to a commercial.

77 minutes
. Romney must choose between spicy and mild. He chooses spicy. Then Romney gives the score in the Game 6 matchup between the Boston Bruins and the Vancouver Canucks. Since the Bruins are winning, and are not Canadian, everyone cheers.

78 to 82 minutes
. Questions about homosexuality. Predictable answers, though there is division on whether to actively seek a repeal of the repeal of “Don’t ask, don’t tell.”

83 to 87 minutes. Questions about abortion. Everyone is pro-life, and no one makes any fuss about Romney’s past support for choice, despite heavy baiting by King.

88 to 93 minutes. Questions about immigration. Cain, who is for the Constitution except when he is not, says he is against birthright citizenship. Paul says, “We should think about protecting our borders, rather than the borders between Iraq and Afghanistan.” Even though there are no borders between Iraq and Afghanistan, the crowd applauds.

94 to 98 minutes
. Two hours is just too long for a debate. After questions about ethanol and eminent domain, which yield little, Pawlenty is asked, Coke or Pepsi? He says Coke, which takes us to another commercial after another gratuitous mention of Twitter by King.

Cletus Miller 06-15-2011 11:08 AM

Re: My God, you are an idiot.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gattigap (Post 454138)

"Questions about immigration. Cain, who is for the Constitution except when he is not, says he is against birthright citizenship"

No questions about Cain's "Great Wall of America" proposal, nor the moat, nor the alligators?

Still the best thing about Cain's campaign.

Adder 06-15-2011 11:12 AM

Re: My God, you are an idiot.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gattigap (Post 454138)

Just a minor quibble, but there are indeed borders between Iraq and Afghanistan, and both the eastern and western borders of Iran are probably being guarded by Americans or our allies right now.

Hank Chinaski 06-15-2011 11:15 AM

Re: My God, you are an idiot.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cletus Miller (Post 454139)
"Questions about immigration. Cain, who is for the Constitution except when he is not, says he is against birthright citizenship"

No questions about Cain's "Great Wall of America" proposal, nor the moat, nor the alligators?

Still the best thing about Cain's campaign.

what's wrong with making wacked out promises?

people promise impossible shit to get elected, especially red meat promises, and it works sometimes. Like Obama promised to close Gitmo to get elected, and he won.

Cletus Miller 06-15-2011 11:20 AM

Re: My God, you are an idiot.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 454142)
what's wrong with making wacked out promises?

people promise impossible shit to get elected, especially red meat promises, and it works sometimes. Like Obama promised to close Gitmo to get elected, and he won.

I think of it as a jobs bill, both for the construction and as a tourist attraction afterward. And alligator skin makes nice belts, so you have the ranching aspect as well.

I really have no problem with the concept, except I dunno how he intends to pay for it.

Cletus Miller 06-15-2011 11:22 AM

Re: My God, you are an idiot.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Adder (Post 454141)
Just a minor quibble, but there are indeed borders between Iraq and Afghanistan, and both the eastern and western borders of Iran are probably being guarded by Americans or our allies right now.

Then they're either doing a piss poor job or those hikers are actually spies.

Hank Chinaski 06-15-2011 11:27 AM

Re: My God, you are an idiot.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cletus Miller (Post 454143)
I think of it as a jobs bill, both for the construction and as a tourist attraction afterward. And alligator skin makes nice belts, so you have the ranching aspect as well.

I really have no problem with the concept, except I dunno how he intends to pay for it.

doesn't a lot of stimulus money still need to be spent? that'd be a great f-you to ironhead and all these bleeding hearts.

Cletus Miller 06-15-2011 11:35 AM

Re: Morning Headline
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Adder (Post 454095)

Is the Tax Rasputin losing his grip now?

futbol fan 06-15-2011 12:11 PM

Re: My God, you are an idiot.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 454145)
doesn't a lot of stimulus money still need to be spent? that'd be a great f-you to ironhead and all these bleeding hearts.

I assumed you'd be in favor of yet still more job-killing failed alligator stimulus after I saw those videos of you jerking off crocodiles at the zoo.

Adder 06-15-2011 12:17 PM

Re: My God, you are an idiot.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 454142)
ike Obama promised to close Gitmo to get elected, and he won.

Do you think he was lying or naive? Which do you think Cain is?

Adder 06-15-2011 12:18 PM

Re: My God, you are an idiot.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cletus Miller (Post 454144)
Then they're either doing a piss poor job or those hikers are actually spies.

You think they aren't?

Adder 06-15-2011 12:19 PM

Re: Morning Headline
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cletus Miller (Post 454146)
Is the Tax Rasputin losing his grip now?

We can only hope.

Cletus Miller 06-15-2011 12:24 PM

Re: My God, you are an idiot.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Adder (Post 454152)
You think they aren't?

doing a piss poor job or actually spies?

Cletus Miller 06-15-2011 12:26 PM

Re: My God, you are an idiot.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Adder (Post 454151)
Do you think he was lying or naive? Which do you think Cain is?

Cain is neither. He's at least partly serious, and not out of naivety.

I wonder if Mitt's Gitmo proposal is still to "double" it.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:09 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com