LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 125
0 members and 125 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 11-18-2010, 10:55 AM   #11
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,231
Re: Election 2010: Teabaggin' the Ds & Rs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski View Post
2. clinton saved some big bucks with that big time "ignore al queda," thing. he did have to pay to rebuild 2 embassies, but fixing the cole hit W.

and I understand the obama plan is that letting the nukes start to leak is okay. they're mainly stored in red states?
Where is that Obama's plan? First of all, Gates, the defense secretary, oversees most, if not all, of the expenditures on this stuff. And I love rhetorical hyperbole as much as the next guy, but do you think he's going to let our nuclear weapon facilities degrade to the point they become dangerous?

The argument is here is over some form of pork Kyl's delivering. That and someone in the GOP sees a good opportunity to paint Obama as weak on defense domestically while fucking with his foreign policy. Cheap, shitty, deflective politics.

This is the gridlock for which we voted. Nothing is going to get done. It's all sideshow nonsense. The only matter of significance right now is what happens with this trade row we have going with China. The rest of the news, IMO, might as well be Entertainment Tonight.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:35 AM.