LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 109
0 members and 109 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-23-2019, 07:39 PM   #4066
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,231
Re: He stuck in his thumb and pulled out a plum

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski View Post
Thanks, but I’ve eaten lunch now. I just thought if I had a quick connect I could get my SAG card, you know, gig economy?
My buddy Rocco sent me your last set of dailies.

Who puts a money shot on the dust ruffle? I don’t even know how that’s done.

Stick to law.

(And that was a grip, not a fluffer. And you still haven’t apologized.)
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
Old 10-23-2019, 07:49 PM   #4067
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,231
Re: Doesn’t Matter Who Wins the K Race; We’re All the Same

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop View Post
Dude, you just said, "I also don't know, nor do you, that Trump lied about his involvement with Russia in a setting in which it would have consequences." If you just assume he's lying until it's proven he isn't, you don't write that sentence.
That’s not me giving him the benefit of the doubt. That’s me saying I don’t know if he’s lied in a setting in which it would have consequences. The man lies in many places. I don’t know if he’s done it in a setting where it’s punishable of which I’m unaware.

I did, however, take the liberty of assuming Adder was as unaware as I am. Maybe he knows of a setting in which Trump lied which would result in consequences.

ETA: I do know, however, that he did not lie in one setting where it’d have consequences: To Mueller. We’d know if he lied there.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.

Last edited by sebastian_dangerfield; 10-23-2019 at 08:00 PM..
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
Old 10-24-2019, 07:26 AM   #4068
LessinSF
Wearing the cranky pants
 
LessinSF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pulling your finger
Posts: 7,123
Is this new for America?

A who cares sex scandal involving a Congresswoman? https://noqreport.com/2019/10/18/kat...e-nude-photos/

LessinKhiva, Uzbekistan (Lawtalkers was blocked in Turkenistan)
__________________
Boogers!
LessinSF is offline  
Old 10-24-2019, 11:15 AM   #4069
Adder
I am beyond a rank!
 
Adder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 17,177
Re: Doesn’t Matter Who Wins the K Race; We’re All the Same

Quote:
Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield View Post
ETA: I do know, however, that he did not lie in one setting where it’d have consequences: To Mueller. We’d know if he lied there.
Not really, given that Manafort would up not cooperating and Mueller had no access to foreign witnesses. But it was likely wise to not let him sit for an interview.
Adder is offline  
Old 10-24-2019, 11:20 AM   #4070
Adder
I am beyond a rank!
 
Adder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 17,177
Re: Is this new for America?

Quote:
Originally Posted by LessinSF View Post
A who cares sex scandal involving a Congresswoman? https://noqreport.com/2019/10/18/kat...e-nude-photos/

LessinKhiva, Uzbekistan (Lawtalkers was blocked in Turkenistan)
Who cares about a sex scandal alleging a consensual and committed relationship?

(And what is that weird website that's so focused on praising Red State's handling of it?)
Adder is offline  
Old 10-24-2019, 03:20 PM   #4071
Tyrone Slothrop
Moderasaurus Rex
 
Tyrone Slothrop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,084
Re: Is this new for America?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adder View Post
Who cares about a sex scandal alleging a consensual and committed relationship?
Like Ben Shapiro's unceasing discussions of transgender people, the point is titillation, masked by some sort of ostensible concern. How conscious or unconscious that is surely varies.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
Tyrone Slothrop is offline  
Old 10-24-2019, 03:41 PM   #4072
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
Registered User
 
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Government Yard in Trenchtown
Posts: 20,182
Re: Is this new for America?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop View Post
Like Ben Shapiro's unceasing discussions of transgender people, the point is titillation, masked by some sort of ostensible concern. How conscious or unconscious that is surely varies.
I was going to answer "Ben Shapiro and every other right wing teenage boy" to Les' question, but really don't like even mentioning that incel. But somehow we all thing of him whenever someone calls out the jeopardy category "Stupid Conversations about Sex".
__________________
A wee dram a day!
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy is offline  
Old 10-24-2019, 05:28 PM   #4073
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,231
Re: Doesn’t Matter Who Wins the K Race; We’re All the Same

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adder View Post
Not really, given that Manafort would up not cooperating and Mueller had no access to foreign witnesses. But it was likely wise to not let him sit for an interview.
It’d be the height of malpractice for Trump’s lawyers to answer anything on his behalf with a response that could be proven a lie. I suspect Trump’s answers fell into the category, “Client does not know at present, based on reasonable investigation.”
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
Old 10-24-2019, 05:34 PM   #4074
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,231
Re: Is this new for America?

Quote:
Originally Posted by LessinSF View Post
A who cares sex scandal involving a Congresswoman? https://noqreport.com/2019/10/18/kat...e-nude-photos/

LessinKhiva, Uzbekistan (Lawtalkers was blocked in Turkenistan)
I want a time machine. Throuple wasn’t an option when I was getting hitched.

Being Gen X is being in a terrible donut hole of Puritanism between the late 60s/70s and the internet hookup culture.

The nsfw photo on the Redstate site shows a third wheel who looks probably pretty cute.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
Old 10-24-2019, 05:42 PM   #4075
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,231
Re: Is this new for America?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy View Post
I was going to answer "Ben Shapiro and every other right wing teenage boy" to Les' question, but really don't like even mentioning that incel. But somehow we all thing of him whenever someone calls out the jeopardy category "Stupid Conversations about Sex".
Ben Shapiro’s voice is creepy. Too high to be a man, but too masculine to be a woman.

He sounds like 16 year old who just aged out of the boys’ chorus and lost all meaning in his life now that he can’t hit the soprano range.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
Old 10-24-2019, 05:45 PM   #4076
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
Registered User
 
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Government Yard in Trenchtown
Posts: 20,182
Re: like the original one

I am so happy.

We are planning the first racist-free Thanksgiving since the rise of Trump.

Happy holidays, everyone!
__________________
A wee dram a day!
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy is offline  
Old 10-24-2019, 06:06 PM   #4077
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,149
Re: like the original one

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy View Post
I am so happy.

We are planning the first racist-free Thanksgiving since the rise of Trump.

Happy holidays, everyone!
huh?
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline  
Old 10-24-2019, 06:17 PM   #4078
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,231
Re: like the original one

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski View Post
huh?
I’m seeing NO relatives for Thanksgiving this year. No racists, no people who want to talk about racists, no Rs, no Ds, no progressives, no conservatives, no Trump discussion... no fucking opinions at all.

What do I win?
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.

Last edited by sebastian_dangerfield; 10-24-2019 at 06:20 PM..
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
Old 10-24-2019, 06:24 PM   #4079
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,149
Re: like the original one

Quote:
Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield View Post
I’m seeing NO relatives for Thanksgiving this year. No racists, no people who want to talk about racists, no Rs, no Ds, no progressives, no conservatives, no Trump discussion... no fucking opinions at all.

What do I win?
Ahh, so ggg is selectively inviting?
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline  
Old 10-24-2019, 06:30 PM   #4080
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,149
Re: like the original one

Quote:
Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield View Post
I’m seeing NO relatives for Thanksgiving this year. No racists, no people who want to talk about racists, no Rs, no Ds, no progressives, no conservatives, no Trump discussion... no fucking opinions at all.

What do I win?
Ahh, so ggg is selectively inviting?
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:14 PM.