| 
	
		
			
				|  » Site Navigation |  
	|  |  
	
		
			
				|  » Online Users: 199 |  
| 0 members and 199 guests |  
		| No Members online |  
		| Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM. |  | 
	
		|  |  |  
	
	
	
	
		|  05-10-2011, 10:03 PM | #316 |  
	| I am beyond a rank! 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 
					Posts: 17,175
				      | 
				
				Re: My God, you are an idiot.
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Replaced_Texan  Close. Pothead while Clinton was trying to reduce troop size. |  I hope he tried the "didn't inhale line."
 
Oddly enough there doesn't seem to be much of a medical mj movement here. |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  05-10-2011, 11:01 PM | #317 |  
	| Random Syndicate (admin) 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Romantically enfranchised 
					Posts: 14,281
				      | 
				
				Re: My God, you are an idiot.
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski  oh. while he was doing everything he could to go after al queda. I remember. |  Clinton or Graham?  Graham left in 1993.  He said they knew about bin Ladin then and were tracking him but I don't think aq was all that formed yet.
				__________________"In the olden days before the internet, you'd take this sort of person for a ride out into the woods and shoot them, as Darwin intended, before he could spawn."--Will the Vampire People Leave the Lobby? pg 79
 
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  05-10-2011, 11:14 PM | #318 |  
	| Proud Holder-Post 200,000 
				 
				Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Corner Office 
					Posts: 86,149
				      | 
				
				Re: My God, you are an idiot.
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Replaced_Texan  Clinton or Graham?  Graham left in 1993.  He said they knew about bin Ladin then and were tracking him but I don't think aq was all that formed yet. |  Graham I support unconditionally. You're the happiest LT sock I have met, and I have to assume he has a role in that. as to AQ, wait for it..... I blame the Clintons.
				__________________I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts  
				 Last edited by Hank Chinaski; 05-10-2011 at 11:19 PM..
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  05-10-2011, 11:18 PM | #319 |  
	| Serenity Now 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Survivor Island 
					Posts: 7,007
				      | 
				
				Re: My God, you are an idiot.
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Adder  I hope he tried the "didn't inhale line."
 Oddly enough there doesn't seem to be much of a medical mj movement here.
 |  On a related topic, I've had several clients come to me recently asking about getting into business with med pot growers/dispensers.  It's legal here under state law but illegal under fed.  We've decided from an ethical and PR standpoint not to get involved, which really sucks, but I don't think there is much of an option (from the ethical standpoint at least). |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  05-10-2011, 11:31 PM | #320 |  
	| Moderasaurus Rex 
				 
				Join Date: May 2004 
					Posts: 33,080
				      | 
				
				Invisible Man is not far behind.
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski  did you, or like I went to Harvard? |  Up there with Love in the Time of Cholera  as having the best last line of any book I've read.
				__________________“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
 
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  05-11-2011, 09:03 AM | #321 |  
	| Guest | 
				
				Re: My God, you are an idiot.
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop  It may feel like his experience as a consumer of medical care kinda sucks, and I'm sure it does, but just remember: His difficulties will play a crucial role in establishing the right incentives for health-care providers, and for that reason will benefit all of us by improving the level of care and driving costs down.  Keep that in mind as he is out there researching prices and declining excessively expensive treatment. |  Quite so.  What is the sacrifice and suffering of a single individual, or many individuals, compared with the reward of an Efficient Market (praise be upon its name) in all things forever, world without end amen. |  
	|  |  |  
	
	
		|  05-11-2011, 11:58 AM | #322 |  
	| the poor-man's spuckler 
				 
				Join Date: Apr 2005 
					Posts: 4,997
				      | 
				
				Re: My God, you are an idiot.
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by ironweed  Quite so.  What is the sacrifice and suffering of a single individual, or many individuals, compared with the reward of an Efficient Market (praise be upon its name) in all things forever, world without end amen. |  That was the real objection to death panels--if some old person wants to spend our money extending a bed-ridden, semi-conscious existence for a few more weeks, the market says they should be allowed to.
				__________________never incredibly annoying
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  05-11-2011, 01:09 PM | #323 |  
	| Moderasaurus Rex 
				 
				Join Date: May 2004 
					Posts: 33,080
				      | 
				
				for Hank
			 
 
				__________________“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
 
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  05-11-2011, 01:33 PM | #324 |  
	| the poor-man's spuckler 
				 
				Join Date: Apr 2005 
					Posts: 4,997
				      | 
				
				Re: for Hank
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop   |  Are law review articles deemed more or less reliable than blogs?  They do have editorial oversight (good), but it is done by law students (bad).  Hmm.
				__________________never incredibly annoying
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  05-11-2011, 01:42 PM | #325 |  
	| Proud Holder-Post 200,000 
				 
				Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Corner Office 
					Posts: 86,149
				      | 
				
				Re: for Hank
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop   |  I read the whole first sentence before realizing there was no need to read further.
				__________________I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts   |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  05-11-2011, 01:45 PM | #326 |  
	| the poor-man's spuckler 
				 
				Join Date: Apr 2005 
					Posts: 4,997
				      | 
				
				Re: for Hank
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski  I read the whole first sentence before realizing there was no need to read further. |  I'll take that as a "more", since you read the first sentence.  Who gets to count that one?
				__________________never incredibly annoying
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  05-11-2011, 02:56 PM | #327 |  
	| Moderasaurus Rex 
				 
				Join Date: May 2004 
					Posts: 33,080
				      | 
				
				Re: for Hank
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Cletus Miller  Are law review articles deemed more or less reliable than blogs?  They do have editorial oversight (good), but it is done by law students (bad).  Hmm. |  Law students don't usually make law review articles worse, except in the sense that they make them longer.
				__________________“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
 
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  05-11-2011, 02:57 PM | #328 |  
	| Moderasaurus Rex 
				 
				Join Date: May 2004 
					Posts: 33,080
				      | 
				
				Re: for Hank
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski  I read the whole first sentence before realizing there was no need to read further. |  I didn't think you would engage, but it could have been interesting.
				__________________“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
 
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  05-11-2011, 03:32 PM | #329 |  
	| the poor-man's spuckler 
				 
				Join Date: Apr 2005 
					Posts: 4,997
				      | 
				
				Re: for Hank
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop  Law students don't usually make law review articles worse, except in the sense that they make them longer. |  It did work out nicely, tho, don't you think?
 
Early line is the 4th Cir overturns the Va district court decision 3-0, right?
				__________________never incredibly annoying
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  05-11-2011, 04:23 PM | #330 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Government Yard in Trenchtown 
					Posts: 20,182
				      | 
				
				Re: for Hank
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop  I didn't think you would engage, but it could have been interesting. |  Really?  It could?
				__________________A wee dram a day!
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		|  |  |  
 
 
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is Off 
 |  |  |  
 
	
	
		
	
	
 |