My God, you are an idiot.

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally Posted by Sidd Finch

Googling this pulls up all kinds of weird shit. I recommend against doing so.

http://www.zawaj.com/askbilqis/fathe...s-pornography/

[Sidd Finch]

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski

http://www.zawaj.com/askbilqis/fathe...s-pornography/

On a quick read, the girl is just saying she say that her father was viewing "extremely inappropriate" and "extremely haram" material on the Internet.

The bacon portrait from the FB on Friday would qualify as that, wouldn't it?

[Cletus Miller]

Originally Posted by Sidd Finch

On a quick read, the girl is just saying she say that her father was viewing "extremely inappropriate" and "extremely haram" material on the Internet.

The bacon portrait from the FB on Friday would qualify as that, wouldn't it?

Why are we assuming OBL's porn stash involved women?

[Sidd Finch]

Originally Posted by Cletus Miller

Why are we assuming OBL's porn stash involved women?

You think a gay man had that many wives? I mean, I know fundamentalist muslims have a thing for beards, but that's ridiculous.


ba-dum-bum.

[Fugee]

Originally Posted by Sidd Finch

You think a gay man had that many wives? I mean, I know fundamentalist muslims have a thing for beards, but that's ridiculous.


ba-dum-bum.

You're on a roll today, Sidd.

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop

Not whiffing -- I'd just like to know what fundamentalist Islamists say about porn.

That women starring in it should be lashed or, if it involves non-family males, stoned.

Whether men viewing it constitutes an offense against Allah is, of course, unaddressed in the Koran, or Shariah.

Next question?

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally Posted by Fugee

Maybe this is whiffing, but isn't porn illegal in most Islamic countries?

So is scotch. This has not, however, prevented the majority of the Saudi Royal Family, much of the Iranian governing elite, and just about every other powerful individual in the Islamic world, from regularly enjoying the product in private, or when visiting abroad (most notably, in the notorious Lebanese discos, which in their heyday resembled Studio 54). One Saudi King in the '70s (can't recall exactly which one, but I think it's the freak who had his own daughter executed for attempting to elope), was known to be a flaming alcoholic.

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally Posted by ironweed

I am willing to extend the Bill Clinton Pass to Huck for that one. Still wouldn't vote for him, but that doesn't make him truly evil. He just doesn't have that reptilian glint I see in the eyes of some of the other ones.

That's awfully kind of you. I can't give either such a pass. I like Bill Clinton and understand why he did what he did. Politics is a wretched business and, considering LBJ, JFK and Nixon killed tens of thousands of our soldiers needlessly in Vietnam, Clinton's sin is, numerically, minor. Still, however, he killed a man he knew should not have been executed purely for political gain. Huckabee did the same. Should they be jailed for it? No. Even punished? No. They were given the right to make the decisions they did. And in Clinton's case, his decisions may have helped to elect our last great president.

But that doesn't mean I want either of these slimy fucks sitting on my good furniture, or drinking from any of the better glasses. However useful they might be, they are scum - walking, breathing shit. And on a personal level, we should never forget that. It should, in fact, be included as an asterisk in the history books. (*Executed a man of capacity so diminished he asked a death row guard to hold a piece of pie from his last meal for him, so he could eat it post-lethal injection.) (*Evangelical who got to play Pontius Pilate in a real life passion play, and did a spot-on rendition.)

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield

That's awfully kind of you. I can't give either such a pass. I like Bill Clinton and understand why he did what he did. Politics is a wretched business and, considering LBJ, JFK and Nixon killed tens of thousands of our soldiers needlessly in Vietnam, Clinton's sin is, numerically, minor. Still, however, he killed a man he knew should not have been executed purely for political gain. Huckabee did the same. Should they be jailed for it? No. Even punished? No. They were given the right to make the decisions they did. And in Clinton's case, his decisions may have helped to elect our last great president.

But that doesn't mean I want either of these slimy fucks sitting on my good furniture, or drinking from any of the better glasses. However useful they might be, they are scum - walking, breathing shit. And on a personal level, we should never forget that. It should, in fact, be included as an asterisk in the history books. (*Executed a man of capacity so diminished he asked a death row guard to hold a piece of pie from his last meal for him, so he could eat it post-lethal injection.) (*Evangelical who got to play Pontius Pilate in a real life passion play, and did a spot-on rendition.)

Oh come on, like you've never killed someone you later thought might not have deserved it. Get off that high horse of yours and take the plastic off the sofa.

So much history today! Schwarzenneggerererer's bastard, Trump bowing out of the race against all expectation, and a historic visit by a head of state:

[Sidd Finch]

Seriously -- who here would have guessed that The Governator had a bastard child?

And how the fuck did he get through the election campaigns and his terms as governor without anyone figuring this out?

[Greedy,Greedy,Greedy]

Originally Posted by Sidd Finch

Seriously -- who here would have guessed that The Governator had a bastard child?

And how the fuck did he get through the election campaigns and his terms as governor without anyone figuring this out?

Does anyone really care? As long as he's not raping the maids like the French politicians.

[Sidd Finch]

Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy

Does anyone really care? As long as he's not raping the maids like the French politicians.

I'm sure you're right -- no one in California would have cared. That's why he waited until after he'd left office to tell anyone.

[Adder]

Originally Posted by Sidd Finch

I'm sure you're right -- no one in California would have cared. That's why he waited until after he'd left office to tell anyone.

According to Gawker it was reported before his initial election.

[Sidd Finch]

Originally Posted by Adder

According to Gawker it was reported before his initial election.

And he promptly acknowledged it, right?