LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 230
0 members and 230 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-20-2010, 05:00 PM   #106
Penske 2.0
Registered User
 
Penske 2.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: The Duchy of Penske
Posts: 2,088
Re: From the Mind of M. Night Bachmann

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy View Post
Yes, you were just a lurker then, but I remember those times as well.
I invented the concept for this Board.
__________________
Man I smashed it like an Idaho potato!
Penske 2.0 is offline  
Old 09-20-2010, 05:02 PM   #107
futbol fan
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: From the Mind of M. Night Bachmann

That she's never going to make page 3 of the Daily Mail no matter what she does with her hair, so why bother trying to impress them?
 
Old 09-20-2010, 05:13 PM   #108
Penske 2.0
Registered User
 
Penske 2.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: The Duchy of Penske
Posts: 2,088
Re: From the Mind of M. Night Bachmann

Quote:
Originally Posted by ironweed View Post
That she's never going to make page 3 of the Daily Mail no matter what she does with her hair, so why bother trying to impress them?
There is a lot of real estate between impressive and phreakscare the shite outta em.

As an example, you noticed that when I came to NYC I left the hempishly fashionable hippie-cum-lumberjack beard (npi-nttawwt) behind, yes?
__________________
Man I smashed it like an Idaho potato!
Penske 2.0 is offline  
Old 09-20-2010, 05:14 PM   #109
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
Registered User
 
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Government Yard in Trenchtown
Posts: 20,182
Re: From the Mind of M. Night Bachmann

Quote:
Originally Posted by Penske 2.0 View Post
I invented the concept for this Board.
I don't understand why people aren't more focused on my real estate condundrums. Obamer needs to bring down the cost of housing - gilded age cottages are getting out of reach.
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy is offline  
Old 09-20-2010, 05:17 PM   #110
Penske 2.0
Registered User
 
Penske 2.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: The Duchy of Penske
Posts: 2,088
Re: From the Mind of M. Night Bachmann

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy View Post
I don't understand why people aren't more focused on my real estate condundrums. Obamer needs to bring down the cost of housing - gilded age cottages are getting out of reach.
Cite please?
__________________
Man I smashed it like an Idaho potato!
Penske 2.0 is offline  
Old 09-20-2010, 05:37 PM   #111
futbol fan
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: From the Mind of M. Night Bachmann

Quote:
Originally Posted by Penske 2.0 View Post
There is a lot of real estate between impressive and phreakscare the shite outta em.

As an example, you noticed that when I came to NYC I left the hempishly fashionable hippie-cum-lumberjack beard (npi-nttawwt) behind, yes?
Yeah, thanks a lot. I promoted the shit out of your NYC appearance with the beard picture, and now I've got boxes of the "Zoo Yawk! The Official Penske Fan-Klub Nooze-Letter" just gathering dust in my basement. People liked the beard, and showing up without it was like Rush not playing Tom Sawyer on the Power Windows tour.
 
Old 09-20-2010, 06:49 PM   #112
Tyrone Slothrop
Moderasaurus Rex
 
Tyrone Slothrop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,080
Republicans for fiscal irresponsibility.

Republicans opposed health care reform ostensibly on the premise that it would increase the deficit because the cost-savings would be undone by future Congresses. Now they're trying to show how right they were by promising to undo the cost savings:

Quote:
Republican congressional aides and advisers say their focus would including blocking funding to hire new Internal Revenue Service agents, who are needed to enforce the law’s tax increases. They also would consider barring spending for a new board that approves Medicare payment cuts as well as on research that compares the effectiveness of medical procedures.

Other potential targets include funds to pay for a long-term care insurance program and money to help states set up insurance exchanges where consumers will be able to use tax credits beginning in 2014.
WSJ
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
Tyrone Slothrop is offline  
Old 09-20-2010, 07:16 PM   #113
Cletus Miller
the poor-man's spuckler
 
Cletus Miller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,997
Re: Republicans for fiscal irresponsibility.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop View Post
Republicans opposed health care reform ostensibly on the premise that it would increase the deficit because the cost-savings would be undone by future Congresses. Now they're trying to show how right they were by promising to undo the cost savings:



WSJ
Is it still socialism if we get he Chinese to pay for it? Or does that just make it worse?
__________________
never incredibly annoying
Cletus Miller is offline  
Old 09-20-2010, 08:19 PM   #114
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,149
Re: Republicans for fiscal irresponsibility.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop View Post
Republicans opposed health care reform ostensibly on the premise that it would increase the deficit because the cost-savings would be undone by future Congresses. Now they're trying to show how right they were by promising to undo the cost savings:



WSJ
you want to hire more government agents to save money? seriously?
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline  
Old 09-20-2010, 08:53 PM   #115
Tyrone Slothrop
Moderasaurus Rex
 
Tyrone Slothrop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,080
Re: Republicans for fiscal irresponsibility.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski View Post
you want to hire more government agents to save money? seriously?
If we got rid of the IRS, that would save the government lots of money going forward, no? Great idea, Chinaski.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
Tyrone Slothrop is offline  
Old 09-20-2010, 09:28 PM   #116
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,149
Re: Republicans for fiscal irresponsibility.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop View Post
If we got rid of the IRS, that would save the government lots of money going forward, no? Great idea, Chinaski.
let's find common ground?

I agree with you that cash for clunkers was a great idea. I do not agree with the naysayers at wiki who say:
  • "On August 26 the DoT reported that the program resulted in 690,114 dealer transactions submitted requesting a total of $2.877 billion in rebates. At the end of the program Toyota accounted for 19.4 % of sales, followed by General Motors with 17.6 %, Ford with 14.4 %, Honda with 13.0 %, and Nissan with 8.7%.It led to a gain in market share for Japanese and Korean manufacturers at the expense of American car makers, with only Ford not taking a significant hit.

See, even if a single US car was sold that made it worth it- because we have to remember this all occurred before the huge influx of US manufacturing jobs, as promised, began to flood in a year into the Dems being at the helm of everything.

By the way, has anyone looked at the level of defaults from the loans on these new cars?

anyway, the level of fucked-up of the CforC is dwarfed by bailing out the auto companies without requiring the union concessions. given the stupidity of that move, no one can say CfC is dumb on any noticable scale.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline  
Old 09-20-2010, 09:37 PM   #117
Adder
I am beyond a rank!
 
Adder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 17,175
Re: Republicans for fiscal irresponsibility.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop View Post
If we got rid of the IRS, that would save the government lots of money going forward, no? Great idea, Chinaski.
Hank's firm has adopted Taxpayer Savings Accounts, in which employees are now responsible for for their own withholding and calculation of potential tax liability. Hank LLP has reduced costs by two FTE and is thinking of adding two paralegals to offset. Maybe three or five depending on how many employees end up in jail.

Win-win-win!!
Adder is offline  
Old 09-20-2010, 09:41 PM   #118
Adder
I am beyond a rank!
 
Adder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 17,175
Re: Republicans for fiscal irresponsibility.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski View Post
let's find common ground?

I agree with you that cash for clunkers was a great idea. I do not agree with the naysayers at wiki who say:
  • "On August 26 the DoT reported that the program resulted in 690,114 dealer transactions submitted requesting a total of $2.877 billion in rebates. At the end of the program Toyota accounted for 19.4 % of sales, followed by General Motors with 17.6 %, Ford with 14.4 %, Honda with 13.0 %, and Nissan with 8.7%.It led to a gain in market share for Japanese and Korean manufacturers at the expense of American car makers, with only Ford not taking a significant hit.

See, even if a single US car was sold that made it worth it- because we have to remember this all occurred before the huge influx of US manufacturing jobs, as promised, began to flood in a year into the Dems being at the helm of everything.
Wait. CforC was about bailing out the US automakers? Does anyone outside of Detroit know this?

And here I thought it was about shifting some demand forward to help fill the hole and replacing fuel inefficient cars with more efficient cars, thus reducing on the margin both greenhouse emissions and dependence on middle eastern oil.
Adder is offline  
Old 09-20-2010, 09:41 PM   #119
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,231
Re: Republicans for fiscal irresponsibility.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop View Post
If we got rid of the IRS, that would save the government lots of money going forward, no? Great idea, Chinaski.
Actually, though it's impossible considering where we are at this juncture in terms of unnecessary complexity and govt interventions, getting rid of the IRS and much of the tax code would greatly benefit the economy and the government.

But it's all preposterous fantasy... as silly as trying to roll back third party involvement in medical care payment and create a direct consumer market.

We are where we are, and we're stuck with it.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
Old 09-20-2010, 09:45 PM   #120
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,231
Re: Republicans for fiscal irresponsibility.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adder View Post
Hank's firm has adopted Taxpayer Savings Accounts, in which employees are now responsible for for their own withholding and calculation of potential tax liability. Hank LLP has reduced costs by two FTE and is thinking of adding two paralegals to offset. Maybe three or five depending on how many employees end up in jail.

Win-win-win!!
Indeed. How could some dim creature like a secretary or paralegal possibly calculate her own tax liability? It's amazing these neanderthals can turn on their desktop monitors in the morning without the help of evolved sorts like you.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:38 PM.