Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Uh, OK. You've got to be right at least some of the time.
|
I am corrected. I did say you assumed something, and you did. You assumed Trump did what the biased articles you cited claim he did. You did not assume I assumed something, which is why I told you to assume I assume the worst of the accusations true.
If you wish to discuss whether Trump did or did not do something (which I do not, as I’d prefer to just assume for purposes of discussion that he did it, as opposed to your basis for that assumption - desire that it be true and provide basis for impeachment), you should cite a source with facts about what he did or did not do, rather than an article about Giuliani doing what he’s hired to do: Spin.
But you don’t have and can’t have that info. All you can offer is conjecture. Why engage in a discussion of what he might have done based on articles from clearly biased sources? Why is this any better than assuming he did it and handicapping how it turns out?
Threaded Mode