LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > The Fashionable

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 213
0 members and 213 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 06-30-2009, 08:34 PM   #11
Atticus Grinch
Hello, Dum-Dum.
 
Atticus Grinch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 10,117
Re: No will?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fugee View Post
If she was just a surrogate, maybe she doesn't even want the kids? Whoever gets them, I hope they get a chance to live a somewhat normal kids life, all things considered.
Yeah, but my point was that California automatically treats the woman who gave birth as the "natural mother," and the only way to terminate that relationship is through adoption. And I don't think the courts will countenance the ruse of a mother giving a child up for adoption solely by his father, because it violates the child's rights by allowing a parent to renounce the duties of parenting without a proper adjudication. (I could be wrong about this, and should ask my friend who has two turkey bastards with her wife, with cross-adoptions, which are allowed in California but you have to do everything exactly right).

In other words, Rowe may not want these kids, but in California that ain't dispositive of the kids' right to have a parent.
Atticus Grinch is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:04 PM.