LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 4,340
0 members and 4,340 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 02-28-2019, 01:28 PM   #11
ferrets_bueller
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Washington
Posts: 228
Re: Doesn’t Matter Who Wins the K Race; We’re All the Same

Whenever you use a loaded phrase, you're dealing with the possibility of receiving what the British used to call "the cut direct."



The offended person simply refuses to recognize the physical existence of the offender. If the offender speaks, he is not heard. One looks through him. It is exceptionally effective.



Now then: Is it acceptable to use an obvious play on words to demonstrate that you are offended by what you have heard? For example, I am not Jewish but my granddaughters are. I am personally disturbed when I hear the phrase "Jew them down" in connection with a negotiation. I have on at least one occasion, responded to hearing this by saying that I would "Christian them down" instead. Acceptable as a dig on the first speaker?
ferrets_bueller is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:12 PM.