LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 1,776
0 members and 1,776 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 04-29-2019, 12:54 PM   #11
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
Registered User
 
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Government Yard in Trenchtown
Posts: 20,182
Re: And do whiteys have to identify with Robert E. Lee

Quote:
Originally Posted by ThurgreedMarshall View Post
It's the baseline. It's the standard. Everything else in this country is other, no matter when you got here. It's the shared ability to crush people based on their race for centuries, isolate them, ostracize them, and then turn around and be angry because you have never needed an identity based on race because you get to be seen as an individual in all things, and be angry about it.

TM
I think the idea that whiteness gets defined based on those who are excluded or oppressed is what makes it unappealing as an identifier. I mean, I'm proud to be Catholic (well, not all the time) or a Bostonian or American, but white? Who is proud of being white?

Which is my reaction to that article. At the end of the end, if you're embracing "whiteness" as your identity, you may want to look in the mirror and see if there is a racist there. The odds are pretty good there is.

It is amazing how little the politics of white identity has changed:

__________________
A wee dram a day!

Last edited by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy; 04-29-2019 at 01:37 PM..
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:48 PM.