LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 1,497
0 members and 1,497 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 12-04-2019, 12:17 PM   #11
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,231
Re: More Sebby bullshit

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy View Post
I know they tell you this on Fox, but are you really slow enough to believe it?

Hint: one has an excellent record on factual accuracy, runs corrections when they make a mistake, and has actually done investigative journalism.
Do you think if you keep repeating that I watch Fox people will believe it? You keep doing that and it's dumb. I'm happy to debate an issue with you, but that bitchy sort of stuff is tedious. You don't need to do it. So don't.

Now as to substance: Both Fox and MSNBC are news slanting machines. Maddow is a ridiculous cheerleader against anything and everything GOP. She was also a close friend of Roger Ailes (oh yes she was... look it up). He schooled her on how to be a media personality the same way he schooled the pundits at Fox. Lawrence O'Donnell at MSNBC is a completely biased bullshit artist. Strangely, Al Sharpton is probably one of then most honest pundits at MSNBC.

News is a product. It is aimed at siloed audiences. MSNBC slants for its audience, Fox slants for its audience. You'll never read it, but Taibbi actually challenges your flawed assertion that Fox is materially more full of shit than MSNBC in Hate, Inc.. He actually devotes a whole chapter to why Maddow is on the cover of the book next to Hannity, and he explains the methods by which MSNBC manipulates readers while appearing (largely to the credulous) to be a reputable news outlet.

The difference? MSNBC does indeed have more reverence for facts. They're much better at subtle spinning than Fox. Where Fox will misrepresent a fact flagrantly, MSNBC will carefully package facts that prove X as facts that prove Y.

Slanting the news is like pregnancy. Once you start doing it, you're in the liars' bucket. That one source does it more than another is worth noting. That one source does it better than another is worth noting. But if you believe MSNBC and Fox are further apart than they are aligned in their models and methods, you're in the sucker bucket. You're buying exactly what MSNBC is selling.

But don't take my word for it. Read Taibbi, or Greenwald, or Chomsky. I've been lucky, or perhaps unlucky, to have been exposed to the inside of cable news a lot over the past 15 years. What those authors, and many more like them, say about media manipulation of the masses rings true.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:47 PM.