LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 2,815
0 members and 2,815 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 12-08-2019, 12:37 PM   #11
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
Registered User
 
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Government Yard in Trenchtown
Posts: 20,182
Re: Sebby's on it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by LessinSF View Post
So, in sum, you admit that once again you were full of shit and there is legitimate medical usage for CBD, and "real medical folks" have been and are funded to "figure it out."

LessinMesquiteNV
Dredging this up again?

You're dealing with a fraction of a fraction of the market. There are indeed folks trying to find ways to use CBD as a medical therapy. Virtually none can attract funding because of the difficulty of patenting in the area and the limited value of regulatory exclusivity. The epilepsy approval, for example, relates to two rare forms of epilepsy and comes with warnings (so the trials are showing that there is a cost to using even that weak form of CBD). Approximate annual cost is north of $30,000.

By the way, I was wrong that there were two approvals; there is one approval and another submission working its way through the process. Sorry for jumping the gun.
__________________
A wee dram a day!
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:22 PM.