This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth

[Adder]

Originally Posted by greatwhitenorthchick

Why are you posting pictures of me on the internet?

You're hot?

[Tyrone Slothrop]

Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy

Do you have a picture of her hanging out in the park with her kid? Otherwise, I think it's an unfair comparison.

Okay (though no kid), but gwinky's going to think I'm stalking her.

[ThurgreedMarshall]

Originally Posted by greatwhitenorthchick

Without makeup, Hilary Swank is also pale. When she was working out at my gym, she did not really look any more movie-starish than any of the other girls there. So I think that's a wash.

I have never seen Garner. But you are correct, Swank is pale. However, I have seen her buying beer at my old beer wholesaler underneath the highline (they sold out to some crappy development, the fuckers) and she is pretty and her body kicks lots of ass. (Ask Mr. Miyagi.)

Originally Posted by greatwhitenorthchick

I kind of think you are comparing apples to oranges. They are both women, but they have totally different looks -- Jennifer Garner is more traditionally pretty, with soft features, while Hilary Swank has a very strong bone structure and big lips and big teeth. I would say Garner is prettier while Hilary is sexier. Depends what you are attracted to.

And they have both each had kickin bodies at one time or another (Hilary has not had children), so I think that's a wash too.

Of course I'm comparing apples to oranges. Why compare apples to apples? (By the way, oranges are better than apples.) I chose these two yesterday because (i) I was bored and (ii) people tend to have strong feelings about how unattractive they are. I don't think Garner's features are that much softer than Swank's, though. I will cop to liking Swank's bigger lips and agree that she should have her teeth filed down. But I don't think Garner is that pretty. I think Swank beats her in both categories, especially the body (even when they were both at their best).

TM

[Flinty_McFlint]

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop

When I see this, all I can think of is that watch seems too clunky for her and her left thumb seems too long and her left pinky too short. Thoughts Coltrane?

[Greedy,Greedy,Greedy]

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop

Okay (though no kid), but gwinky's going to think I'm stalking her.

It that her with Penske and Friends?

[Greedy,Greedy,Greedy]

Originally Posted by Flinty_McFlint

When I see this, all I can think of is that watch seems too clunky for her and her left thumb seems too long and her left pinky too short. Thoughts Coltrane?

That's a nice watch. What kind of scotch do you think she likes?

[Did you just call me Coltrane?]

Originally Posted by ThurgreedMarshall

I don't think my curve is way high. Garner is very fit, which makes her above average. But take a look at some of the photos of her when she hasn't had a team working on her for days.



Average. And pale. Not un-cute. But if you passed her on the street and she wasn't famous, no one on this board would think, "Wow."

TM

I would think "cute". But you're right, she wouldn't be the hottest girl I saw all day.

[ThurgreedMarshall]

Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy

Do you have a picture of her hanging out in the park with her kid? Otherwise, I think it's an unfair comparison.

What the fuck does her kid have to do with anything?

TM

[Replaced_Texan]

Originally Posted by Did you just call me Coltrane?

I would think "cute". But you're right, she wouldn't be the hottest girl I saw all day.

I was always impressed that she could go from cute to hot pretty quickly in Alias, but then I loved Alias.

ETA: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=85qnnHEQqDM

[Did you just call me Coltrane?]

Originally Posted by greatwhitenorthchick

I kind of think you are comparing apples to oranges.

I hate this saying. I prefer apples to orangutans.

I think you can compare apples and oranges. They're both fruit. They both grow on trees. They both can be made into juice.

Apples and orangutans having nothing in common.

[Did you just call me Coltrane?]

Originally Posted by Flinty_McFlint

When I see this, all I can think of is that watch seems too clunky for her and her left thumb seems too long and her left pinky too short. Thoughts Coltrane?

I don't like chronographs. Pain in the ass to service.

[Did you just call me Coltrane?]

Originally Posted by Replaced_Texan

I was always impressed that she could go from cute to hot pretty quickly in Alias, but then I loved Alias.

ETA: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=85qnnHEQqDM

It's the dimples that make her cute. When she's in great shape, she's hot.

[Did you just call me Coltrane?]

Originally Posted by Atticus Grinch

Dream of the Spearfisherman's Wife?

Is she biting her lip? I am a sucker for the lip-bite, but only if it appears to be done without intent.

[greatwhitenorthchick]

Originally Posted by ThurgreedMarshall

But I don't think Garner is that pretty.

TM

I suppose there is just a subjective determination to whether someone is pretty or not. For example, I do not think Gwyneth Paltrow has a pretty face. But an old officemate of mine (male) (the one officemate I liked) thought she was the be-all and end-all of beauty.

[Greedy,Greedy,Greedy]

Originally Posted by Did you just call me Coltrane?

I hate this saying. I prefer apples to orangutans.

I think you can compare apples and oranges. They're both fruit. They both grow on trees. They both can be made into juice.

Apples and orangutans having nothing in common.

Apples have more calories than oranges. I don't know how many calories orangutans have, or whether you'd want to compare based on weight, since I don't think you'd eat a whole one, but you can compare them all based on calories.