» Site Navigation |
|
|
» Online Users: 181 |
| 0 members and 181 guests |
| No Members online |
| Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM. |
|
 |
|
09-24-2009, 01:18 PM
|
#4156
|
|
Steaming Hot
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Giving a three hour blowjob
Posts: 8,220
|
Re: Vs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski
the level of whiffs these past few days has been staggering, and when someone of coltrane's abilities does it, well, it is time for us all to take a deep breath, and ask ourselves if the thought we are about to convey wasn't in fact included in the original post, before hitting "submit".
|
I actually thought Coltrane was being meta, not whiffing.
|
|
|
09-24-2009, 01:23 PM
|
#4157
|
|
I am beyond a rank!
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Appalaichan Trail
Posts: 6,201
|
Re: Vs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Did you just call me Coltrane?
Are apples and oranges the same species? No. Not even in the same FAMILY! Wait a second, I think I'm contradicting my earlier argument.

|
Do you think that guy is just signing his family name to the bottom of his message?
I thought so.
|
|
|
09-24-2009, 01:24 PM
|
#4158
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Near the rose
Posts: 1,040
|
Re: Paltrow Vs. Bessette-Kennedy
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThurgreedMarshall
I just assume I'm on everyone's list until I am soundly rejected.
TM
|
Also known as the Billy Martin approach.
CDF
__________________
Axe murderer? No problem!
|
|
|
09-24-2009, 01:28 PM
|
#4159
|
|
I am beyond a rank!
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Appalaichan Trail
Posts: 6,201
|
Re: Paltrow Vs. Bessette-Kennedy
Quote:
Originally Posted by bold_n_brazen
You don't have to kill for those teeth, just pay for them.
|
Unless your only source of income is whacking people.
|
|
|
09-24-2009, 01:29 PM
|
#4160
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Throwing a kettle over a pub
Posts: 14,753
|
Re: Vs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by greatwhitenorthchick
I actually thought Coltrane was being meta, not whiffing.
|
Thanks for having my back.
__________________
No no no, that's not gonna help. That's not gonna help and I'll tell you why: It doesn't unbang your Mom.
|
|
|
09-24-2009, 01:30 PM
|
#4161
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Throwing a kettle over a pub
Posts: 14,753
|
Re: In search of...
Quote:
Originally Posted by cheval de frise
Engaging with Hank on "whiffs" is like asking him about his scorekeeping. There's no chance of a meeting of the minds. For at least two reasons.
CDF
|
Thanks for having my back.
__________________
No no no, that's not gonna help. That's not gonna help and I'll tell you why: It doesn't unbang your Mom.
|
|
|
09-24-2009, 01:32 PM
|
#4162
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Near the rose
Posts: 1,040
|
Re: In search of...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski
he stepped on her joke. and while we're at it, when someone posts "thanks for having my back," they typically understand that the post was actually an insult. it's a convention that goes back to Penske/Paigow days. I didn't call you on the whiff, since your know coltrane.
|
You amuse me. Then again, so does my dog. Can you tell me more about conventions in board history?
CDF
__________________
Axe murderer? No problem!
|
|
|
09-24-2009, 01:33 PM
|
#4163
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Near the rose
Posts: 1,040
|
Re: In search of...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Did you just call me Coltrane?
Thanks for having my back.
|
You misunderstand. I was only assuming a cranial vacuum in one participant.
(ETA that I'm now on the correct "meta" plane given the Gwinky post. I think. Nothing to see here.)
CDF
__________________
Axe murderer? No problem!
Last edited by cheval de frise; 09-24-2009 at 01:36 PM..
|
|
|
09-24-2009, 01:34 PM
|
#4164
|
|
Steaming Hot
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Giving a three hour blowjob
Posts: 8,220
|
Re: Paltrow Vs. Bessette-Kennedy
Quote:
Originally Posted by cheval de frise
I have an overwhelming urge to fight the hypothetical and say "neither."
CDF
|
Me too. Fuck, this is a toughie.
I guess I would take Gwyneth too, but it would be really great if she got a personality transplant.
Since we are now comparing women who sort-of have the same features, how about Rachel McAdams v. Jennifer Garner? I would say Rachel by a mile, but it's kind of unfair b/c she is quite a bit younger.
Last edited by greatwhitenorthchick; 09-24-2009 at 01:37 PM..
|
|
|
09-24-2009, 01:43 PM
|
#4165
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Throwing a kettle over a pub
Posts: 14,753
|
Re: Paltrow Vs. Bessette-Kennedy
Quote:
Originally Posted by greatwhitenorthchick
Since we are now comparing women who sort-of have the same features, how about Rachel McAdams v. Jennifer Garner? I would say Rachel by a mile, but it's kind of unfair b/c she is quite a bit younger.
|
By many miles.
I likey the McAdams.

__________________
No no no, that's not gonna help. That's not gonna help and I'll tell you why: It doesn't unbang your Mom.
|
|
|
09-24-2009, 01:54 PM
|
#4166
|
|
[intentionally omitted]
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 18,597
|
Re: Paltrow Vs. Bessette-Kennedy
Quote:
Originally Posted by greatwhitenorthchick
Me too. Fuck, this is a toughie.
I guess I would take Gwyneth too, but it would be really great if she got a personality transplant.
Since we are now comparing women who sort-of have the same features, how about Rachel McAdams v. Jennifer Garner? I would say Rachel by a mile, but it's kind of unfair b/c she is quite a bit younger.
|
Not even a contest.
The Vs. rules require that the two candidates be competitive.
Sorry.
TM
Last edited by ThurgreedMarshall; 09-24-2009 at 01:58 PM..
|
|
|
09-24-2009, 02:06 PM
|
#4167
|
|
I am beyond a rank!
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Appalaichan Trail
Posts: 6,201
|
Re: Paltrow Vs. Bessette-Kennedy
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThurgreedMarshall
Not even a contest.
The Vs. rules require that the two candidates be competitive.
Sorry.
TM
|
She looks so much better as a brunette. That particular photo makes the point especially obvious.
|
|
|
09-24-2009, 02:26 PM
|
#4168
|
|
the poor-man's spuckler
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,997
|
Re: Paltrow Vs. Bessette-Kennedy
Quote:
Originally Posted by dtb
she looks so much better as a brunette. That particular photo makes the point especially obvious.
|
2!
__________________
never incredibly annoying
|
|
|
09-24-2009, 02:27 PM
|
#4169
|
|
Wild Rumpus Facilitator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: In a teeny, tiny, little office
Posts: 14,167
|
Re: Spa Ideas?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pretty Little Flower
A friend of mine went to this place after a break up and found it to be a perfect place to recover.
|
Where does the hiking come in? Up the stairs to the VIP lounge?
__________________
Send in the evil clowns.
|
|
|
09-24-2009, 02:41 PM
|
#4170
|
|
Wild Rumpus Facilitator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: In a teeny, tiny, little office
Posts: 14,167
|
Re: Vs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThurgreedMarshall
I don't think my curve is way high. Garner is very fit, which makes her above average. But take a look at some of the photos of her when she hasn't had a team working on her for days.
Average. And pale. Not un-cute. But if you passed her on the street and she wasn't famous, no one on this board would think, "Wow."
TM
|
I'd hit it.
__________________
Send in the evil clowns.
|
|
|
 |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|