» Site Navigation |
|
|
» Online Users: 115 |
| 0 members and 115 guests |
| No Members online |
| Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM. |
|
 |
|
07-02-2009, 02:45 PM
|
#736
|
|
Southern charmer
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: At the Great Altar of Passive Entertainment
Posts: 7,033
|
Re: Now this is an interview
Quote:
Originally Posted by dtb
It took me a few reads to understand what I think you are saying here. At first, I didn't know what you meant by "spluged" but my hank-to-English translation program believes that you mean "splooged" (that's how they spell it in the OED).
So, are you saying that in the last movie your ex-aunt acted in, her character in that movie was favored with a sample of the semen of the character that was playing her son in said movie? Can we assume that the semenlike substance was merely a prop and not the real thing?
Thanks for sharing, Hank!
|
And here I thought he meant "spluged" as in the Nickelodeon-bucket-of-green-slime sense, and that he was trying to tell us that his famous ex-family members were actually part of wacky, somewhat over-the-top family programming.
This wide room for varying interpretations may underlie many of Hank's frustrations about how noone understands what the fuck he really is trying to say, but OTOH I suppose he can take solace in the many possible readings of his work for which the true artiste strives.
__________________
I'm done with nonsense here. --- H. Chinaski
|
|
|
07-02-2009, 02:53 PM
|
#737
|
|
I am beyond a rank!
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Appalaichan Trail
Posts: 6,201
|
Re: Now this is an interview
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gattigap
And here I thought he meant "spluged" as in the Nickelodeon-bucket-of-green-slime sense, and that he was trying to tell us that his famous ex-family members were actually part of wacky, somewhat over-the-top family programming.
|
Ahhhhh. A textual interpretation I had not considered! Will we ever know the true meaning?
|
|
|
07-02-2009, 02:57 PM
|
#738
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Throwing a kettle over a pub
Posts: 14,753
|
Re: Now this is an interview
Quote:
Originally Posted by dtb
Can we assume that the semenlike substance was merely a prop and not the real thing?
|
Great prop to have when you're banging an ugly girl doggy style and can't quite finish. Just fake the "O" sounds and throw the splooge prop on her back and go to sleep.
C'mon, who hasn't done this?
__________________
No no no, that's not gonna help. That's not gonna help and I'll tell you why: It doesn't unbang your Mom.
|
|
|
07-02-2009, 03:02 PM
|
#739
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Government Yard in Trenchtown
Posts: 20,182
|
Heh, heh - he said "Strunk"!
Quote:
Originally Posted by dtb
Ahhhhh. A textual interpretation I had not considered! Will we ever know the true meaning?
|
I just checked the urban dictionary (come on, dtb, Hank and the OED?), and they posit that "spluge" is the verb and "splooge" the noun.
Hank seems to know whereof he speaks in this circumstance.
|
|
|
07-02-2009, 03:04 PM
|
#740
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Throwing a kettle over a pub
Posts: 14,753
|
Re: Heh, heh - he said "Strunk"!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
I just checked the urban dictionary (come on, dtb, Hank and the OED?), and they posit that "spluge" is the verb and "splooge" the noun.
|
I'd never heard the term "sharted" before until I read textsfromlastnight.com.
__________________
No no no, that's not gonna help. That's not gonna help and I'll tell you why: It doesn't unbang your Mom.
|
|
|
07-02-2009, 06:50 PM
|
#741
|
|
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,149
|
Re: Heh, heh - he said "Strunk"!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
I just checked the urban dictionary (come on, dtb, Hank and the OED?), and they posit that "spluge" is the verb and "splooge" the noun.
Hank seems to know whereof he speaks in this circumstance.
|
thank you. and conf to dtb:
no dtb, it wasn't an XXX, and your analysis was too cruel for an ex #1 friend, and the splooge was some hollywood recipe- it was a movie most of have seen, or at least you've seen one of the series, and, even if I wasn't right, a "hank spells poorly" post is beneath you. or i should say, it was beneath the 2005 dtb.
edit: harummpf. http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=spluge
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Last edited by Hank Chinaski; 07-02-2009 at 06:53 PM..
|
|
|
07-02-2009, 06:51 PM
|
#742
|
|
Patch Diva
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Winter Wonderland
Posts: 4,607
|
PLF Outed!
|
|
|
07-02-2009, 07:33 PM
|
#743
|
|
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,149
|
Re: Now this is an interview
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gattigap
And here I thought he meant "spluged" as in the Nickelodeon-bucket-of-green-slime sense, and that he was trying to tell us that his famous ex-family members were actually part of wacky, somewhat over-the-top family programming.
This wide room for varying interpretations may underlie many of Hank's frustrations about how noone understands what the fuck he really is trying to say, but OTOH I suppose he can take solace in the many possible readings of his work for which the true artiste strives.
|
translation: although Hank has proven me ignorant a few dozen times, I keep trying to insult him, or maybe I'm ignorant, or forgetful? Can any of you help me to have a more intelligent persona?
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
|
|
|
07-02-2009, 07:42 PM
|
#744
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Government Yard in Trenchtown
Posts: 20,182
|
Re: Heh, heh - he said "Strunk"!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski
thank you. and conf to dtb:
no dtb, it wasn't an XXX, and your analysis was too cruel for an ex #1 friend, and the splooge was some hollywood recipe- it was a movie most of have seen, or at least you've seen one of the series, and, even if I wasn't right, a "hank spells poorly" post is beneath you. or i should say, it was beneath the 2005 dtb.
edit: harummpf. http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=spluge
|
I'm here for you whenever you want a back-handed compliment.
|
|
|
07-02-2009, 07:48 PM
|
#745
|
|
I am beyond a rank!
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Appalaichan Trail
Posts: 6,201
|
Re: Heh, heh - he said "Strunk"!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski
thank you. and conf to dtb:
no dtb, it wasn't an XXX, and your analysis was too cruel for an ex #1 friend, and the splooge was some hollywood recipe- it was a movie most of have seen, or at least you've seen one of the series, and, even if I wasn't right, a "hank spells poorly" post is beneath you. or i should say, it was beneath the 2005 dtb.
edit: harummpf. http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=spluge
|
Oh, no, dear Hankie. It wasn't the spelling "error" -- who knows with these kinds of words? It was genuine befuddlement as to what you were trying to convey. But isn't the fact that I understood you despite your possibly opaque sentence formation proof that our #1 status is destiny?
|
|
|
07-02-2009, 07:49 PM
|
#746
|
|
Southern charmer
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: At the Great Altar of Passive Entertainment
Posts: 7,033
|
Re: Now this is an interview
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski
translation: although Hank has proven me ignorant a few dozen times, I keep trying to insult him, or maybe I'm ignorant, or forgetful? Can any of you help me to have a more intelligent persona?
|
dtb, scratch that. I'm guessing Hank's not a fan of Nick programming.
__________________
I'm done with nonsense here. --- H. Chinaski
|
|
|
07-03-2009, 09:25 AM
|
#747
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Government Yard in Trenchtown
Posts: 20,182
|
Re: Heh, heh - he said "Strunk"!
Quote:
Originally Posted by dtb
Oh, no, dear Hankie. It wasn't the spelling "error" -- who knows with these kinds of words? It was genuine befuddlement as to what you were trying to convey. But isn't the fact that I understood you despite your possibly opaque sentence formation proof that our #1 status is destiny?
|
You need to learn "teenage boy".
Really, you do.
|
|
|
07-03-2009, 09:59 AM
|
#748
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,231
|
Re: Now this is an interview
Quote:
Originally Posted by dtb
It took me a few reads to understand what I think you are saying here. At first, I didn't know what you meant by "spluged" but my hank-to-English translation program believes that you mean "splooged" (that's how they spell it in the OED).
So, are you saying that in the last movie your ex-aunt acted in, her character in that movie was favored with a sample of the semen of the character that was playing her son in said movie? Can we assume that the semenlike substance was merely a prop and not the real thing?
Thanks for sharing, Hank!
|
6 oz. heavy cream
3 oz. baby oil
3 tbsp. Miracle Whip
1 Supersoaker 50
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
|
|
|
07-03-2009, 05:45 PM
|
#749
|
|
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,149
|
Re: Heh, heh - he said "Strunk"!
Quote:
Originally Posted by dtb
Oh, no, dear Hankie. It wasn't the spelling "error" -- who knows with these kinds of words? It was genuine befuddlement as to what you were trying to convey. But isn't the fact that I understood you despite your possibly opaque sentence formation proof that our #1 status is destiny?
|
your boys are what, 7? 8? hint: in 6 years, when you check their underwear, it'll be crusty.
but of course I value your friendship, and ability to understand me. Today, at a smart Viennese Cafe, I had an argument about Jung and his theory of death and life, and I am not sure the Professori to whom I was trying to explain ever fully grasped the essence of my poitn.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Last edited by Hank Chinaski; 07-03-2009 at 05:48 PM..
|
|
|
07-03-2009, 11:56 PM
|
#750
|
|
I am beyond a rank!
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 17,175
|
Re: Heh, heh - he said "Strunk"!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski
your boys are what, 7? 8? hint: in 6 years, when you check their underwear, it'll be crusty.
but of course I value your friendship, and ability to understand me. Today, at a smart Viennese Cafe, I had an argument about Jung and his theory of death and life, and I am not sure the Professori to whom I was trying to explain ever fully grasped the essence of my poitn.
|
There is amusing public art in Bratislava.
|
|
|
 |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|