LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 121
0 members and 121 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 11-24-2010, 10:29 AM   #11
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,231
Re: Election 2010: Teabaggin' the Ds & Rs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Atticus Grinch View Post
I don't think they're bad people, but I think being allowed to lie as a central component of your job withers the soul. See also, anyone who sells cars and/or real estate.
How many cases have you won without using at least five or six "constructive lies"? Even when your client's totally in the right, there are those bad facts in a case that must be massaged. And by massaged, I mean spun. And by spun, I mean avoided, forgotten or shaded in a manner suggesting the presence of events diametrically opposed to those which actually took place. And by that I mean, how many times have you tried a case without employing "lawyer's lies"?

Exactly.

Now, remove the word "lawyer's." Because that in itself is misleading. The only descriptive that honestly fits is "lies." You have lied, I have lied. Every litigator has lied. Hundreds of times over his career.

It doesn't wilt the soul for me. If no one lied, we wouldn't have courts.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.

Last edited by sebastian_dangerfield; 11-24-2010 at 11:22 AM..
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:39 PM.