LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 137
0 members and 137 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 01-04-2011, 12:37 PM   #11
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
Registered User
 
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Government Yard in Trenchtown
Posts: 20,182
Re: Election 2010: Teabaggin' the Ds & Rs

Quote:
Originally Posted by sgtclub View Post
Sorry, I have been busy preparing for the coup.

But please, will you stop posting this nonsense. The amount of debt that was amassed over the last two years is unprecedented. And I will bet any amount of money that Obamacare will not only not save money, it will cost 10x what they are predicting.
What provisions do you think are going to result in substantial government expense?

The one you might expect, broadening coverage, is modeled on a Massachusetts provision (Romneycare in your parlence) and budgetting was done with full knowledge of the outcomes there. Note that Romneycare has been slightly more expensive and slightly more successful in terms of expanding coverage than originally projected, but its overall costs, even without the fed's rate-setting voodoo, have been modest.

Absent that provision, I'm not sure where you think the cost overruns are going to be.
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy is offline  
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:45 PM.