LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 102
0 members and 102 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 10-05-2010, 04:55 PM   #11
Penske 2.0
Registered User
 
Penske 2.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: The Duchy of Penske
Posts: 2,088
Re: Election 2010: Teabaggin' the Ds & Rs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Atticus Grinch View Post
It is true that Islamic theology and political theory has a notion that the group is responsible for allowing a sinner to sin, whereas Western Christendom has evolved instead a notion that the world is imperfectible and everyone is responsible only for the sins they commit, not the ones they passively allow.*

*Exception: Women are responsible for the impure thoughts of the men who see them in both cultures, which is why in both cultures a woman must wear modest dress in public.
As a non-muslim, why should I give a rat's shitty arse what their theories or notions are? Also, why shouldn't I seek to mock any groups that attempt to modestize the dress of women? If men can be topless in public, why can't women?.....did the ERA cover that issue?
__________________
Man I smashed it like an Idaho potato!
Penske 2.0 is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:00 PM.