LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 116
0 members and 116 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 11-10-2010, 12:07 AM   #11
Penske 2.0
Registered User
 
Penske 2.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: The Duchy of Penske
Posts: 2,088
Re: Election 2010: Teabaggin' the Ds & Rs

Quote:
Originally Posted by ThurgreedMarshall View Post
That's the way the woman looks. There really isn't much to work with. But why does it matter so much to you, especially when you just admitted you have no complaints about her job performance?*

TM

*And I should just let this whole thing go as a reward to you for admitting that at all, but what can you do?
Have you ever seen a fashion magazine, Vogue, Elle, GQ, W etc etc? Seen a makeover show? You're kidding right? She was born with ill fitting ill draped clothes that accentuate some of her worst physical features, and she's wearing an unflattering colour and you don't think that there is anything that she can do? Watch a few hundred episodes of "What Not to Wear" and get back to me.

And I doing this out of love for her. It's construction criticism (mean shit would have been mentioning her double wide arse and hips. I don't do that anymoure. I've evolved).

And as for job performance, that's not enough. I want aesthetically pleasing as well. Or at least not fashion phreaky.
__________________
Man I smashed it like an Idaho potato!
Penske 2.0 is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:32 PM.