LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 232
0 members and 232 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 01-05-2011, 06:31 PM   #11
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Moderator
 
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pop goes the chupacabra
Posts: 18,532
Re: Election 2010: Teabaggin' the Ds & Rs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cletus Miller View Post
Haven't the "official" deficit numbers for the past 25+ years have treated the SS Bonds as off of the *deficit* books? The general fund takes the SS surplus and has not counted the bonds issued to SS as deficit.

Or am I imagining something?
I guess it depends on what "off books" means. The deficit figures commonly cited include the surplus revenue from social security, which makes the deficit seem smaller than it "actually" is (i.e., non-SS government spending is even more in deficit compared to non-SS revenue). Is that on book or off book?
__________________
[Dictated but not read]
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:44 PM.