LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 131
0 members and 131 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 07-10-2012, 03:47 PM   #11
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,149
Re: But not a drop to drink.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adder View Post
And again, how does confiscating their water containers prevent the poisoning of the water supply?
they aren't to have access to the water. to poison the water they'd need access. perhaps taking the water back makes it clear they aren't to go near the water, so that anyone who does go near the water can be seen as a threat. you are reading a blog from, it would appear, an Israeli who is as out there as any of Ty's DU american bloggers. I don't know that he has accurately mentioned all facts, but he has a sort of clear bias, don't you think? I'm simply pointing out there is a reason I could see for trying to keep Israeli water only to Israelis. That they take back water that has already been "stolen," instead of preventing future "thefts" may be silly, it may also not be any part of the motivation for the IDF. The IDF may simply be fucking with these people. I admit I can't know what is going on from this article- why can't you admit there may be a valid reason for the action?
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:26 PM.