This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth

[ltl/fb]

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski

come up with a set of criteria that lets you insult every woman that posts here as being damaged goods.

like- for a woman to be fulfilled she needs to be

1) multi-orgasmic
2) large breasted
3) possessed of the self-realization that only comes from almost getting killed, then fighting back step by step to a full recovery.

you can add a fourth-

4) accepted into the bacon of the month club- full memeber!
then you knock them each down. I believe Sidd is the only one of us who meets all three of these

I am not sure whether I am multi-orgasmic, as I do not remember any sex I have had, but I think I was active in that sphere.

[ltl/fb]

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski

come up with a set of criteria that lets you insult every woman that posts here as being damaged goods.

like- for a woman to be fulfilled she needs to be

1) multi-orgasmic
2) large breasted
3) possessed of the self-realization that only comes from almost getting killed, then fighting back step by step to a full recovery.

you can add a fourth-

4) accepted into the bacon of the month club- full memeber!
then you knock them each down. I believe Sidd is the only one of us who meets all three of these

I am not going to die from the accident. Really. Y'all can be mean again.

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally Posted by ltl/fb

I am not going to die from the accident. Really. Y'all can be mean again.

you were the mean one, so we'll know we can be a little bit mean once you start being a lot mean again.

[Adder]

Originally Posted by ltl/fb

I am not going to die from the accident. Really. Y'all can be mean again.

Hank just thinks that he might have a shot now if you no longer recall his past failures. He'll probably start pulling your pigtails soon.

[ltl/fb]

Originally Posted by Adder

Hank just thinks that he might have a shot now if you no longer recall his past failures. He'll probably start pulling your pigtails soon.

Is this mean?

[Hank Chinaski]

baseball q for burger or T or whatever sock ventures an answer-

Tigers at home up 1-0 going into the 6th. Our starting pitcher gives up a run, then gets two guys out, falters, gets pulled. The reliever gets the third out, so the score is tied.

bottom of the sixth we score and that run turns out to be the winning run. who is the winning pitcher, the starter who starts the 6th or the reliever who finishes it?

[The One That Cries]

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski

baseball q for burger or T or whatever sock ventures an answer-

Tigers at home up 1-0 going into the 6th. Our starting pitcher gives up a run, then gets two guys out, falters, gets pulled. The reliever gets the third out, so the score is tied.

bottom of the sixth we score and that run turns out to be the winning run. who is the winning pitcher, the starter who starts the 6th or the reliever who finishes it?

Another reason I cry is because its next to impossible to get a good MotorCityBagel anymore......does anyone even remember that P invented that delish dish?

[The One That Cries]

Originally Posted by ltl/fb

I am not sure whether I am multi-orgasmic, as I do not remember any sex I have had, but I think I was active in that sphere.

This makes me cry. I don't know you because I am new here, but I feel your pain, and as a note of hope, I note that, in my limited sexperience, multi-orgasmicability can be learned......or re-learned, I suppose, as the case may be.

[ltl/fb]

Originally Posted by The One That Cries

This makes me cry. I don't know you because I am new here, but I feel your pain, and as a note of hope, I note that, in my limited sexperience, multi-orgasmicability can be learned......or re-learned, I suppose, as the case may be.

I feel no pain about this issue.

[Tyrone Slothrop]

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski

baseball q for burger or T or whatever sock ventures an answer-

Tigers at home up 1-0 going into the 6th. Our starting pitcher gives up a run, then gets two guys out, falters, gets pulled. The reliever gets the third out, so the score is tied.

bottom of the sixth we score and that run turns out to be the winning run. who is the winning pitcher, the starter who starts the 6th or the reliever who finishes it?

The winning run was scored while the reliever was the pitcher of record, so he gets the W. The starter can't get the W if the game was tied when he left.

eta: "pitcher of record" -- is that an actual baseball term, or just a dumb thing a lawyer would say?

[Tyrone Slothrop]

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop

The winning run was scored while the reliever was the pitcher of record, so he gets the W. The starter can't get the W if the game was tied when he left.

The MLB rule:

10.17 Winning And Losing Pitcher
(a) The official scorer shall credit as the winning pitcher that pitcher whose team assumes a lead while such pitcher is in the game, or during the inning on offense in which such pitcher is removed from the game, and does not relinquish such lead, unless
(1) such pitcher is a starting pitcher and Rule 10.17(b) applies; or
(2) Rule 10.17(c) applies.
Rule 10.17(a) Comment: Whenever the score is tied, the game becomes a new contest insofar as the winning pitcher is concerned. Once the opposing team assumes the lead, all pitchers who have pitched up to that point and have been replaced are excluded from being credited with the victory. If the pitcher against whose pitching the opposing team gained the lead continues to pitch until his team regains the lead, which it holds to the finish of the game, that pitcher shall be the winning pitcher.
(b) If the pitcher whose team assumes a lead while such pitcher is in the game, or during the inning on offense in which such pitcher is removed from the game, and does not relinquish such lead, is a starting pitcher who has not completed
(1) five innings of a game that lasts six or more innings on defense, or
(2) four innings of a game that lasts five innings on defense, then the official scorer shall credit as the winning pitcher the relief pitcher, if there is only one relief pitcher, or the relief pitcher who, in the official scorer’s judgment was the most effective, if there is more than one relief pitcher.
Rule 10.17(b) Comment: It is the intent of Rule 10.17(b) that a relief pitcher pitch at least one complete inning or pitch when a crucial out is made, within the context of the game (including the score), in order to be credited as the winning pitcher. If the first relief pitcher pitches effectively, the official scorer should not presumptively credit that pitcher with the win, because the rule requires that the win be credited to the pitcher who was the most effective, and a subsequent relief pitcher may have been most effective. The official scorer, in determining which relief pitcher was the most effective, should consider the number of runs, earned runs and base runners given up by each relief pitcher and the context of the game at the time of each relief pitcher’s appearance. If two or more relief pitchers were similarly effective, the official scorer should give the presumption to the earlier pitcher as the winning pitcher.
(c) The official scorer shall not credit as the winning pitcher a relief pitcher who is ineffective in a brief appearance, when at least one succeeding relief pitcher pitches effectively in helping his team maintain its lead. In such a case, the official scorer shall credit as the winning pitcher the succeeding relief pitcher who was most effective, in the judgment of the official scorer.
Rule 10.17(c) Comment: The official scorer generally should, but is not required to, consider the appearance of a relief pitcher to be ineffective and brief if such relief pitcher pitches less than one inning and allows two or more earned runs to score (even if such runs are charged to a previous pitcher). Rule 10.17(b) Comment provides guidance on choosing the winning pitcher from among several succeeding relief pitchers.
(d) A losing pitcher is a pitcher who is responsible for the run that gives the winning team a lead that the winning team does not relinquish.
Rule 10.17(d) Comment: Whenever the score is tied, the game becomes a new contest insofar as the losing pitcher is concerned.
(e) A league may designate a non-championship game (for example, the Major League All-Star Game) for which Rules 10.17(a)(1) and 10.17(b) do not apply. In such games, the official scorer shall credit as the winning pitcher that pitcher whose team assumes a lead while such pitcher is in the game, or during the inning on offense in which such pitcher is removed from the game, and does not relinquish such lead, unless such pitcher is knocked out after the winning team has attained a commanding lead and the official scorer concludes that a subsequent pitcher is entitled to credit as the winning pitcher.

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop

The MLB rule:
, then the official scorer shall credit as the winning pitcher the relief pitcher, if there is only one relief pitcher, or the relief pitcher who, in the official scorer’s judgment was the most effective, if there is more than one relief pitcher.

wow. never knew that one.

[cheval de frise]

Originally Posted by The One That Cries

Another reason I cry is because its next to impossible to get a good MotorCityBagel anymore......does anyone even remember that P invented that delish dish?

Positively Favre-ian. Complete with wild throws into double coverage, iykwimaityd.

CDF

[ThurgreedMarshall]

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop

Hey TM, someone forgot the stake in the heart.

Why is it that every analyst thinks MN is automatically a better team now? I think they're fucked.

Last year they made the playoffs. They are a running team and they need a quarterback who understands that. Instead they are going to get a washed-up, ego maniac who just had surgery and has a (new?) tear in his labrum, who thinks he's too good for training camp and is in love with stupid, risky passes that lead to interceptions. How is this a good thing?

When Peterson gets fewer carries because Favre bitches about how he's being used or when he audibles out of a play designed for the best running back in the league, what happens? When the team busts its ass in a close game for 4 quarters and Favre tries to make something happen, throwing across the field, across his body and off his back foot, right into the hands of the defender, what happens?

Why doesn't anyone have the balls to openly criticize this guy? Fuck him.

TM

[Sidd Finch]

Originally Posted by ltl/fb

I am not going to die from the accident. Really. Y'all can be mean again.

We try to be nice and this is what we get? Fuck you.

(How's that?)