» Site Navigation |
|
|
» Online Users: 119 |
| 0 members and 119 guests |
| No Members online |
| Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM. |
|
 |
|
09-24-2009, 02:45 PM
|
#4171
|
|
Wild Rumpus Facilitator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: In a teeny, tiny, little office
Posts: 14,167
|
Re: wtf?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
That's a nice watch. What kind of scotch do you think she likes?
|
I don't know, but I bet when it comes to cigars she insists on Churchill's.
__________________
Send in the evil clowns.
|
|
|
09-24-2009, 02:46 PM
|
#4172
|
|
Wild Rumpus Facilitator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: In a teeny, tiny, little office
Posts: 14,167
|
Re: Vs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by greatwhitenorthchick
Arghh. These women do have something in common. They are both women. So apples to oranges is way more apt.
Moran.
|
I baught that
__________________
Send in the evil clowns.
|
|
|
09-24-2009, 02:49 PM
|
#4173
|
|
Wild Rumpus Facilitator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: In a teeny, tiny, little office
Posts: 14,167
|
Re: Paltrow Vs. Bessette-Kennedy
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThurgreedMarshall
Of course there's a subjective determination. That's what makes the discussion interesting.
For today's Vs., we have:
Paltrow
vs.
Bessette-Kennedy
I used to think Gwyneth Paltrow was pretty in a kind of ballerina way. But I think she ruined it with her personality. I never thought much of Bessette, even though she was considered by some* to be the be-all and end-all of beauty. She struck me as the real-life version of that Seinfeld girlfriend who looks great in a certain light and awful 5 minutes later in another.
TM
*Hi paigow!
eta: Whoa. When was the last time bnb and I were thinking the same thing?
|
Paltrow was hot in Shakespeare in Love. I don't know that I've considered her hot in much else. Bessette Kennedy is definitely one who depends upon the kindness of photographers.
__________________
Send in the evil clowns.
|
|
|
09-24-2009, 02:52 PM
|
#4174
|
|
the poor-man's spuckler
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,997
|
Re: Vs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by taxwonk
I'd hit it.
|
I wonder if this is one of the things Fringey remembers.
__________________
never incredibly annoying
|
|
|
09-24-2009, 02:59 PM
|
#4175
|
|
[intentionally omitted]
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 18,597
|
New ways to be ridiculous? Yes, please.
|
|
|
09-24-2009, 03:19 PM
|
#4176
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Throwing a kettle over a pub
Posts: 14,753
|
Re: Paltrow Vs. Bessette-Kennedy
Quote:
Originally Posted by dtb
She looks so much better as a brunette. That particular photo makes the point especially obvious.
|
Hot with any hair color:

__________________
No no no, that's not gonna help. That's not gonna help and I'll tell you why: It doesn't unbang your Mom.
|
|
|
09-24-2009, 03:36 PM
|
#4177
|
|
Moderasaurus Rex
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,082
|
Re: Vs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by greatwhitenorthchick
I actually thought Coltrane was being meta, not whiffing.
|
For future reference, I am always being meta, and never whiffing.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
|
|
|
09-24-2009, 03:53 PM
|
#4178
|
|
[intentionally omitted]
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 18,597
|
Re: Vs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop
For future reference, I am always being meta, and never whiffing.
|
Total reverse-cowgirl-dirty-sanchez-air-ball-pro-establishment whiff.
TM
|
|
|
09-24-2009, 04:11 PM
|
#4179
|
|
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,149
|
Re: Vs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop
For future reference, I am always being meta, and never whiffing.
|
post hoc
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
|
|
|
09-24-2009, 04:17 PM
|
#4180
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Throwing a kettle over a pub
Posts: 14,753
|
Re: Vs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski
post hoc
|
It's cute when you try to apply Paigow's "rules".
__________________
No no no, that's not gonna help. That's not gonna help and I'll tell you why: It doesn't unbang your Mom.
|
|
|
09-24-2009, 04:24 PM
|
#4181
|
|
[intentionally omitted]
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 18,597
|
Re: Paltrow Vs. Bessette-Kennedy
Quote:
Originally Posted by Did you just call me Coltrane?
|
But who wins between her and Beckinsale?
TM
|
|
|
09-24-2009, 04:27 PM
|
#4182
|
|
Steaming Hot
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Giving a three hour blowjob
Posts: 8,220
|
Re: Paltrow Vs. Bessette-Kennedy
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThurgreedMarshall
But who wins between her and Beckinsale?
TM
|
Kate Beckinsale is way too plastic to be worthy competition.
|
|
|
09-24-2009, 04:30 PM
|
#4183
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Throwing a kettle over a pub
Posts: 14,753
|
Re: Paltrow Vs. Bessette-Kennedy
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThurgreedMarshall
But who wins between her and Beckinsale?
TM
|
McAdams.
Mila Kunis beats both:

__________________
No no no, that's not gonna help. That's not gonna help and I'll tell you why: It doesn't unbang your Mom.
|
|
|
09-24-2009, 04:30 PM
|
#4184
|
|
I am beyond a rank!
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Appalaichan Trail
Posts: 6,201
|
Re: Paltrow Vs. Bessette-Kennedy
Quote:
Originally Posted by greatwhitenorthchick
Kate Beckinsale is way too plastic to be worthy competition.
|
She's kind of weird looking, I think. That picture is more flattering than most I've seen of her. She's sort of horse-y.
|
|
|
09-24-2009, 04:53 PM
|
#4185
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Throwing a kettle over a pub
Posts: 14,753
|
Family Grounds Cafe
So, this place recently opened in the vicinity:
http://www.familygroundscafe.com/
It is basically a cafe with an indoor play area for little children (tons of toys, toddler-sized playhouses, tables for coloring, etc.). Music and other entertainment is often provided. They charge $7.50 per child for 1.5 hours. My daughter and I went there with a buddy and his son. It was great. We got to sit and enjoy coffee and a croissant/bagel, and the kids (26 and 20 months) ran around and had a blast. We occasionally had to get up and make sure no one was hurting anyone else, etc, but it was relatively relaxing. On rainy days it is packed, and I bet it'll get even more crowded during winter.
I thought that all of this would be a great idea for an actual restaurant, but the buddy was concerned about having booze in the area (which I didn't think was a good point since Chucky Cheese has been doing it for years).
Thoughts?
I should probably post this on the Parents board.
__________________
No no no, that's not gonna help. That's not gonna help and I'll tell you why: It doesn't unbang your Mom.
|
|
|
 |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|