This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth

[Atticus Grinch]

Originally Posted by Replaced_Texan

I had no idea the chick from Mean Girls was the same as the chick from Wedding Crashers. I never bothered to learn either girl's name.

The only useful piece of information I've ever gotten from the FB is that the underage nymphet who gets pregnant in Animal House is also the underage nymphet who doesn't get pregnant in Caddyshack. This made me happy. Then I found her Wikipedia page indicating that her movie career lasted only two years because drug abuse triggered her schizophrenia. This made me sad, especially because the professor's "it's a distinct possibility" answer to Pinto was SUPPOSED TO BE A JOKE.

[Flinty_McFlint]

Originally Posted by Atticus Grinch

The only useful piece of information I've ever gotten from the FB is that the underage nymphet who gets pregnant in Animal House is also the underage nymphet who doesn't get pregnant in Caddyshack. This made me happy. Then I found her Wikipedia page indicating that her movie career lasted only two years because drug abuse triggered her schizophrenia. This made me sad, especially because the professor's "it's a distinct possibility" answer to Pinto was SUPPOSED TO BE A JOKE.

Hey, that's not fair at all. I clearly remember telling you that thing about looking at a "girl's" Adam's apple. That has to have come in useful for you.

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally Posted by Atticus Grinch

The only useful piece of information I've ever gotten from the FB is that the underage nymphet who gets pregnant in Animal House is also the underage nymphet who doesn't get pregnant in Caddyshack. This made me happy. Then I found her Wikipedia page indicating that her movie career lasted only two years because drug abuse triggered her schizophrenia. This made me sad, especially because the professor's "it's a distinct possibility" answer to Pinto was SUPPOSED TO BE A JOKE.

was i on ignore when i told the board that sly stallone was the uncredited "subway punk" that beat up woody in Bananas?

plus all the dish about my ex-aunt?

[ltl/fb]

Originally Posted by Flinty_McFlint

Hey, that's not fair at all. I clearly remember telling you that thing about looking at a "girl's" Adam's apple. That has to have come in useful for you.

How can knowing I get a temp plastic tooth tomorrow NOT be useful?

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally Posted by ltl/fb

How can knowing I get a temp plastic tooth tomorrow NOT be useful?

i'm vegan/macrobiotic. i can't date someone with artificial material in any orifice i might be in

[ltl/fb]

Originally Posted by notcasesensitive

I have seen (and liked) both of those movies! I love you, Rachel McAdams!!!!!!!! (more as a brunette than as a blonde)

Her name seems familiar to me. So I probably knew exactly who she was at some time.

[ltl/fb]

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski

i'm vegan/macrobiotic. i can't date someone with artificial material in any orifice i might be in

I have other fake stuff on a tooth that got broken and pins or something in my pelvis/hips. And a plate in my leg, but that's not relevant.

[Greedy,Greedy,Greedy]

Originally Posted by Atticus Grinch

The only useful piece of information I've ever gotten from the FB is that the underage nymphet who gets pregnant in Animal House is also the underage nymphet who doesn't get pregnant in Caddyshack. This made me happy. Then I found her Wikipedia page indicating that her movie career lasted only two years because drug abuse triggered her schizophrenia. This made me sad, especially because the professor's "it's a distinct possibility" answer to Pinto was SUPPOSED TO BE A JOKE.

Wow. So no improvement, even after your wife got TM's tips?

[greatwhitenorthchick]

Originally Posted by ThurgreedMarshall

And I'm the one with impossibly high standards.

TM

When have I ever criticized your standards?

[Fugee]

Originally Posted by greatwhitenorthchick

When have I ever criticized your standards?

I'm the one who thinks his curve is high. I still don't think Jennifer Garner is average. She may not be WOW HOT but looking around at women as a whole, she's at least above average and I'd put her at pretty.

Maybe being in New York skews the perception with more models and actresses (and wannabes of both) per capita than in the rest of the country.

[Fugee]

I don't do litigation and had never been on jury duty before so this came as a surprise to me: juries are very scary things.

I hope never to have a jury decide my fate, not even in a civil matter.

[Hank Chinaski]

http://msn.foxsports.com/cbk/story/1...rts-in-2009-10 so MSU has NO one 6'10" or over. we will be small and fast- can that win?

AL playoffs- would be RS v. Yanks except they are same division- so the wild card bounces to LA? I fear the Yanks, but I fear Fenway more. The Tigers NEVER win there.

Originally Posted by Fugee

I don't do litigation and had never been on jury duty before so this came as a surprise to me: juries are very scary things.

I hope never to have a jury decide my fate, not even in a civil matter.

Yes. Funny to laugh at the pictures of Wal-Mart shoppers. Less funny to have them deciding whether the prosecution has established all of the elements of the crime you're charged with, or whether the plaintiff is entitled to recover punitive damages from you under the relevant statute.

Lots of civil litigation settles.

[Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)]

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski

AL playoffs- would be RS v. Yanks except they are same division- so the wild card bounces to LA? I fear the Yanks, but I fear Fenway more. The Tigers NEVER win there.

this point would be more interesting if the sox didn't have the second best record. So it's 1 vs 4 (NY v Det) and 2 v 3

[cheval de frise]

Originally Posted by ironweed

Yes. Funny to laugh at the pictures of Wal-Mart shoppers. Less funny to have them deciding whether the prosecution has established all of the elements of the crime you're charged with, or whether the plaintiff is entitled to recover punitive damages from you under the relevant statute.

Lots of civil litigation settles.

In a patent case you end up with lots of analogies to try to make complicated concepts understandable. But as in any other litigation, it mostly depends on the story you have to tell. It's very scary for defendants in bet-the-company cases.

CDF