LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 208
0 members and 208 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 12-30-2010, 06:04 PM   #11
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,149
Re: Election 2010: Teabaggin' the Ds & Rs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop View Post
If you don't know, just say you don't know. I know it's a little embarrassing for you, since you repeated what I said and told me I didn't know what I was talking about.



No shit, Sherlock. I said that yesterday and that was where you came in. The question is, what was it about what Rhee was proposing that they saw as a threat to their officer's positions? It seemed to me that Rhee perceived that potential obstacle, and designed her plan to avoid that problem. So where did she go wrong?

Obviously, you don't know. C'mon, use that fantastical experience you have with unions to say something useful.
are the union officers employees of the union or of the school district?

and by the way, I know where the union and rhee differed, but simply that is linking to interviews- unless you get an erection treating this place like a current event test-

and I also know where the officers' paychecks come from, but again, you need to understand this to see what dynamics were at play
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts

Last edited by Hank Chinaski; 12-30-2010 at 06:08 PM..
Hank Chinaski is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:31 PM.