Election 2010: Teabaggin' the Ds & Rs

[Cletus Miller]

Originally Posted by Adder

Perhaps I should read the whole thing, but this certainly doesn't make Assange sounds uncrazy.

Why is he more at risk in Sweden than he was in the UK? Do we have a deal with UK that we won't kidnap "enemies of the state" from their soil, but not with Sweden?

And, I don't think it makes him sound crazy, just a little self-important.

[Adder]

Originally Posted by Cletus Miller

Why is he more at risk in Sweden than he was in the UK? Do we have a deal with UK that we won't kidnap "enemies of the state" from their soil, but not with Sweden?

And, I don't think it makes him sound crazy, just a little self-important.

Sounds paranoid to me, especially for the reasons you cite. But yeah, self-important is clear. I'm sure his internet followers eat it up though.

ETA: Where are the Newt's of the world to declare Loughner a terrorist?

[Cletus Miller]

Originally Posted by Adder

ETA: Where are the Newt's of the world to declare Loughner a terrorist?

They can't *definitely* tie him to DU-like anti-American thinking (ala John Walker Lindh and others), so there's too much risk calling him a terrorist if the investigation turns up any convincing evidence that he shared sympathies with R talking points.

[Adder]

Originally Posted by Cletus Miller

They can't *definitely* tie him to DU-like anti-American thinking (ala John Walker Lindh and others), so there's too much risk calling him a terrorist if the investigation turns up any convincing evidence that he shared sympathies with R talking points.

So you're suggesting that they are less than fully unbiased when making their carefully considered judgments about what's terrorism and what isn't?

Does that explain Giuliani's recent terrorist-endorsing activities?

[Cletus Miller]

Originally Posted by Adder

So you're suggesting that they are less than fully unbiased when making their carefully considered judgments about what's terrorism and what isn't?

Does that explain Giuliani's recent terrorist-endorsing activities?

Oh, you've got Rudy all wrong. He was suggesting that the stated goal of a terrorist organization was a good thing, not the means they have employed to achieve it, nor their *actual*, not-very-hidden goal. And, as we all know, the enemy of our enemy is our friend, even if they would also be our enemy if their enemy didn't exist, cf. most of the sectarians we are paying to be our friends in Iraq and Afghanistan.

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally Posted by Cletus Miller

Oh, you've got Rudy all wrong. He was suggesting that the stated goal of a terrorist organization was a good thing, not the means they have employed to achieve it, nor their *actual*, not-very-hidden goal. And, as we all know, the enemy of our enemy is our friend, even if they would also be our enemy if their enemy didn't exist, cf. most of the sectarians we are paying to be our friends in Iraq and Afghanistan.

could you explain this?

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally Posted by Adder

So you're suggesting that they are less than fully unbiased when making their carefully considered judgments about what's terrorism and what isn't?

Does that explain Giuliani's recent terrorist-endorsing activities?

not sure I get this?

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally Posted by Adder

Sounds paranoid to me, especially for the reasons you cite. But yeah, self-important is clear. I'm sure his internet followers eat it up though.

ETA: Where are the Newt's of the world to declare Loughner a terrorist?

can you elaborate?

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally Posted by Cletus Miller

Why is he more at risk in Sweden than he was in the UK? Do we have a deal with UK that we won't kidnap "enemies of the state" from their soil, but not with Sweden?

And, I don't think it makes him sound crazy, just a little self-important.

who?

[Adder]

Maybe we need a monarch.

[Hank Chinaski]

the arizonia shooter seemed well known as a potential lune for some time. is there something wrong with when we pull people off the streets? I know it is a potential violation of right?

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally Posted by Adder

Maybe we need a monarch.

this is more understandable than your organic posts. no offense

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally Posted by Sidd Finch

If this board is any guide, that could be the one job worse than jizz-mopper.

what do you mean?

[Adder]

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski

can you elaborate?

Yes.

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally Posted by Adder

Yes.

thanks. again someone else's words seem to be better crafted.