Quote:
	
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Cletus Miller  They can't *definitely* tie him to DU-like anti-American thinking (ala John Walker Lindh and others), so there's too much risk calling him a terrorist if the investigation turns up any convincing evidence that he shared sympathies with R talking points. | 
	
 So you're suggesting that they are less than fully unbiased when making their carefully considered judgments about what's terrorism and what isn't?
Does that explain Giuliani's recent terrorist-endorsing activities?