LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 221
0 members and 221 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 01-05-2011, 05:19 PM   #11
sgtclub
Serenity Now
 
sgtclub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Survivor Island
Posts: 7,007
Re: Election 2010: Teabaggin' the Ds & Rs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cletus Miller View Post
Okay an example, using made up numbers.

SS has a FY revenue deficit of $100B:

Option 1: SS redeems $100B of bonds. The $100B is paid to SS out of the general fund. The Gov't sells $100B in new bonds to the public. This adds $100B to the FY deficit.

Option 2: SS sells $100B (+/-, depending on the applicable coupon) of bonds on the open market. The $100B is paid to SS by China. The Gov't issues no new bonds, but loses the power to cancel them. The deficit is the same as it would have been without the redemption.

True, it's a wash on total debt. But that doesn't mean it's the same thing.
What do you mean it's not the same thing? Either way, the Government has an obligation to pay $100B + interest. The only thing that is different is the payee. What am I missing?
sgtclub is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:48 PM.